Navigating the Paradox: Cognitive Dissonance and Common-Sense Exploration in Cosmology

Cognitive dissonance is the discomfort that arises when one holds contradictory beliefs simultaneously. For example, someone might claim to love cows while also enjoying hamburgers. While this tension isn't inherently negative and can lead to positive changes, it becomes problematic when individuals respond with denial, angst, anger, or avoidance. People experiencing severe cognitive dissonance may blame others, avoid certain topics, or rationalize poor decisions. Relief from this psychological tension occurs when contradictory beliefs find a sensible way to coexist. For instance, reducing meat consumption or exploring vegan hamburger options if one loves both cows and hamburgers.
Aristotle emphasized the challenge of studying and contemplating a concept without immediate acceptance or rejection. F. Scott Fitzgerald highlighted the true sign of intelligence as the ability to entertain contradictory ideas simultaneously. The capacity to consider opposing thoughts without succumbing to cognitive dissonance is indicative of a balanced and intelligent mind. Intelligent individuals refrain from hasty judgments and take the time to thoroughly research and weigh evidence from all sides of an issue.
To illustrate cognitive dissonance, consider the subject of cosmology. Traditional teachings present a view of Earth as a spinning ball in space, revolving around the Sun in a complex cosmic dance. However, questioning these assumptions is often met with condemnation. Albert Einstein warned against condemning without investigation, emphasizing the ignorance in such an approach.
Instead of condemning, denying, or ridiculing, let's engage in an investigation without bias. Let's examine an alternative perspective—our everyday common-sense experience of the world.