Premium Only Content
Let's Talk About it!
I want to address the push back I got on my last video and show what the case was. These kind of mistakes should not happen no matter who you are. That is the point. If a creator is going to play content on a stream that content should be fully watched and edited before ever going live. No names were given, that video is calling out the behavior and nothing else. If this was BHB, Zav Girl, Laura, JLR or any Creator that people do not like People would be outraged and 50 or more videos would have been made. Trashing the person that did this. Plain and simple. I did not trash anyone. What if that man was your Husband, Father, Grand Father, Brother? Does it still make it acceptable? In my opinion nothing about that situation is acceptable. Before someone claims I am doing this video against any person. I am not, so do not make it about a single person! 💖
QueenBee
https://www.youtube.com/@QueenBeeEscobar
Saturday Morning Shenanigans! let's talk about it! OPEN PANEL
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hWRog3lf2hQ
Voice for the voiceless
https://www.youtube.com/@Voiceforthevoiceless
Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCRXBYdSlSUeYKFT_5o5oX1w/join
Missed a live stream or live premier, but want to support my channel? Send a Super Thanks (found near the Like and Share buttons) or:
CashApp: $TigerTalks
Venmo: @tigertalks
Your support means a lot and is much appreciated!
Thank you to Menace2Sobriety for creating my AMAZING Intro!!!
All comments are welcome as long as they are respectful. I will delete any and all hate speech comments as soon as I see them. It is fine to have an opinion on the situation just be respectful in the comments. Thank you for stopping by and checking out my videos.
Song: Elektronomia - Sky High [NCS Release]
Music provided by NoCopyrightSounds
Free Download/Stream: http://ncs.io/skyhigh
Watch: Elektronomia - Sky High | NCS - Copyright Free Music
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TW9d8vYrVFQ
Copyright Disclaimer: Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 17 U.S.C. 106 and 17 U.S.C. 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. Cute graphics and some Avitars credit: Vecteezy.com
AI made with Genmo.
-
1:58:24
Spitfire Spotlight
6 days agoBeej: "Pay attention- The truth always comes out!" 🤔
9515 -
LIVE
Steven Crowder
2 hours ago🔴 The Definitive Jeffrey Epstein Recap: Dissecting the Incoherent Narrative
56,202 watching -
The Dan Bongino Show
3 hours agoNo Dudes In Dresses (Ep. 2449) - 02/10/2026
363K260 -
LIVE
The Rubin Report
1 hour ago‘The View’s’ Sunny Hostin Didn’t Realize How Condescending She Sounded Lecturing Her Audience
1,870 watching -
LIVE
LFA TV
14 hours agoLIVE & BREAKING NEWS! | TUESDAY 2/10/26
3,821 watching -
1:23:12
Benny Johnson
1 hour ago🚨Smoking Gun Epstein Document SHOCKS World, Reveals Trump's Secret Role in Takedown | 'Informant…?'
25.7K22 -
LIVE
Chad Prather
1 hour agoNew Docs Reveal Trump CALLED POLICE On Epstein + Ghislaine Makes Deal W/ Trump? + Top Stories!
526 watching -
1:08:46
Graham Allen
3 hours agoEsptein BOMBSHELL!!! TPUSA Has The #1 Livestream ALL TIME! + Candace Is BIG MAD At Jesus?!
163K555 -
LIVE
Badlands Media
6 hours agoBadlands Daily: 2/10/26
3,887 watching -
2:10:41
Connor Tomlinson
7 hours agoAre Donors Dictating Nigel Farage's Foreign Policy?
3.7K1