Dr Judy Wood
911Revisionist
- 18 / 20
1
September 11, 2001 - The Truth is Stanger than Fiction
24:18

September 11, 2001 - The Truth is Stanger than Fiction

Brandon Aceto @BrandonAceto, Head of Research for Valuetainment & PBD Podcast, discusses 9/11 evidence of the destruction NOT being a conventional controlled demolition, using ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism. A Collapse / Demolition Thought Experiment Put on your thinking caps students Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/a-911-thought-experiment Controlled Demolition Expert Speaks Out! What we saw on 9/11 was not due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/controlled-demolition-expert-speaks Myanmar Provides a 9/11 Lesson for Critical Thinkers Showing you just how easily people are duped, who don't know any better Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/myanmar-provides-a-911-lesson-for
3 comments
2
9/11 Truth Equals Censorship or Death
7:50

9/11 Truth Equals Censorship or Death

Wikipedia's block listed 9/11 scientist. Cancelled by Wikipedia for 14 years and counting. Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/wikipedias-block-listed-911-scientist 9/11 Movie Nights Revisit 9/11 with "9/11 Revisionist" and watch some of the best documentaries Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-movie-nights
4 comments
3
PBD Podcast & The Towers Went Poof!!
1:18

PBD Podcast & The Towers Went Poof!!

Dr Judy Wood on the PBD podcast A reaction: “The Towers Went Poof” - Twin Towers Disintegration & Direct Energy Evidence Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/dr-judy-wood-on-the-pbd-podcast
2 comments
4
Exposed: The 9/11 Truth Movement Talking Heads
11:29

Exposed: The 9/11 Truth Movement Talking Heads

Steven E. Jones, Richard Gage, Niels Harrit and Kevin Ryan Full discussion: https://dhughes.substack.com/t/911 Exposed: The 9/11 Truth Movement Talking Heads Steven E. Jones, Richard Gage, Niels Harrit and Kevin Ryan, just to name a few Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/exposed-the-911-truth-movement-talking The molecular dissociation of the thermite & nuke theories People are so easily led by perceived "experts". Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-controlled-demolition-of-thermite You can download the Refutation of Richard Gage’s Game in 2008 AND 2023: https://truthsummit.info/media-files/DrJudyWood-refutation-RichardGage-claims.pdf Is the 9/11 "truth" movement a distraction movement? What happens if you ask TRUTH questions? Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/questions-for-the-911-truther-talking 9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline "The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
 1.03K  views
5
An 1h Presentation of irrefutable 9/11 evidence
1:41:35

An 1h Presentation of irrefutable 9/11 evidence

Prof David A. Hughes – An 1h Presentation of irrefutable 9/11 evidence There are three key layers to perception management: (i) the official narrative, (ii) the official approved alternative narrative, and (iii) the truth. Presentation: https://dhughes.substack.com/p/in-defence-of-judy-wood 9/11 Truth and the Silence of the IR Discipline – Prof David A, Hughes Given the massive amount of evidence calling the official "9/11" narrative into question, why won't academia ask any critical questions? Read the peer reviewed paper here: https://dhughes.substack.com/p/911-truth-and-the-silence-of-the 9/11 Evidence presented by Dr Judy Wood – Prof David A. Hughes Contrary to the "nanothermite" hypothesis of the "Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth," and the nuke theorists, the Twin Towers were evidently destroyed at low temperatures, revealing the reality of "Cold Fusion". Article: https://dhughes.substack.com/p/in-defence-of-judy-wood-0ce
 2.13K  views 1 comment
6
Invisible Weaponry on 9/11
1:05:39

Invisible Weaponry on 9/11

The Solari Report - Catherine Austin Fitts Professor David A. Hughes recently discussed the work of Dr Judy Wood and the implications of the evidence she presents. Unfortunately the Solari Report has the discussion behind a paywall and their agreement with Prof Hughes was that he could have a copy and publish it on his substack, but also behind a paywall. Luckily, with substack, you can clip sections up to 5 minutes long from videos on the platform and that is what I did. I did not clip the full discussion, but most of it, so here it is and please don't get upset due to it being a bunch of clips slapped together. Solari Report: https://solari.com/invisible-weaponry-the-implications-of-dr-judy-woods-work-with-david-a-hughes/ David A Hughes substack: https://dhughes.substack.com/p/interview-with-elze-van-hamelen-may-38a 9/11 Evidence presented by Dr Judy Wood – Prof David A. Hughes Contrary to the "nanothermite" hypothesis of the "Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth," and the nuke theorists, the Twin Towers were evidently destroyed at low temperatures, revealing the reality of "Cold Fusion". Article: https://dhughes.substack.com/p/in-defence-of-judy-wood-0ce
 1.21K  views 4 comments
7
Open Disclosure: September 11, 2001
1:55:05

Open Disclosure: September 11, 2001

Open Disclosure with Dr Judy Wood & Andrew Johnson 28 September 2016 The only two brave souls that tried to take on the US Government in 2007, that the 9/11 "truth" movement is keeping hidden. Read their court filings. Dr Morgan Reynolds: https://nomoregames.net/2011/06/12/request-for-correction-by-nist-for-its-invalid-wtc-jetliner-animations-and-analyses/ Dr Judy Wood: https://www.drjudywood.com/wp/court-case-qui-tam/ Wikipedia's block listed 9/11 scientist. Cancelled by Wikipedia for 14 years and counting. Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/wikipedias-block-listed-911-scientist Dr Wood 2012 presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWNzq9OWGmY Condemnation, without investigation, is the height of ignorance - Albert Einstein.
2 comments
8
The New Hiroshima - Who were the terrorists on 9/11?
2:23:44

The New Hiroshima - Who were the terrorists on 9/11?

Dr. Judy Wood presents and discusses conclusive evidence that a new unconventional weapon was used in the destruction of the WTC complex on 9/11. Madison - August 4th 2007 Please also see her later work from 2008 onwards - when additional information was discovered about this. http://wheredidthetowersgo.com/ Directed Energy Weapons (DEW) – a category used to differentiate from Kinetic Energy weapons such as explosives and nukes which do not explain the evidence. Government, media and most truth groups will not correctly discuss DEW-related evidence. 9/11 Evidence presented by Dr Judy Wood – Prof David A. Hughes Contrary to the "nanothermite" hypothesis of the "Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth," and the nuke theorists, the Twin Towers were evidently destroyed at low temperatures, revealing the reality of "Cold Fusion". Article: https://dhughes.substack.com/p/in-defence-of-judy-wood-0ce Wikipedia's block listed 9/11 scientist. Cancelled by Wikipedia for 14 years and counting. Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/wikipedias-block-listed-911-scientist The only two brave souls that tried to take on the US Government in 2007, that the 9/11 "truth" movement is keeping hidden. Read their court filings. Dr Morgan Reynolds: https://nomoregames.net/2011/06/12/request-for-correction-by-nist-for-its-invalid-wtc-jetliner-animations-and-analyses/ Dr Judy Wood: https://www.drjudywood.com/wp/court-case-qui-tam/ Dr Wood 2012 presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWNzq9OWGmY Condemnation, without investigation, is the height of ignorance - Albert Einstein. A time comes when silence is betrayal. - Martin Luther King
 1.49K  views
9
Jerm Warfare interviews Dr Judy Wood (2021)
50:35

Jerm Warfare interviews Dr Judy Wood (2021)

Jerm Warfare 9/11 Podcasts: https://www.jermwarfare.com/tag/9-11/ Wikipedia's block listed 9/11 scientist. Cancelled by Wikipedia for 14 years and counting. Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/wikipedias-block-listed-911-scientist There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11; 1. Problem solving skills 2. Group Think 3. They just can't handle the implications
 2.38K  views 3 comments
10
Jesse Ventura DEW & 9/11
42:56

Jesse Ventura DEW & 9/11

Conspiracy Theory with Jesse Ventura - The "Death Ray" Episode D.E.P.S. - Directed Energy Professional Society You'll be surprised to hear who the members are. Read the article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/deps-the-directed-energy-professional Controlled Demolition Expert Speaks Out! What we saw on 9/11 was not due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/controlled-demolition-expert-speaks WHAT exactly happened to ALL 7 buildings with a WTC prefix on Sept 11, 2001? The following points need to be made regarding what exactly happened to the buildings and the observable evidence at ground zero, that the “9/11 truth movement” never touch on… Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/what-exactly-happened-to-all-7-buildings
 2.3K  views 6 comments
11
"Smoking steel" and the "Smoking rubble" after 9/11
8:24

"Smoking steel" and the "Smoking rubble" after 9/11

Smoke for 100 days at ground zero
12
Zero Point Energy, Exotic Weaponry and 9/11
1:21:26

Zero Point Energy, Exotic Weaponry and 9/11

Seattle 2008 - With John Hutchison & Dr Judy Wood
13
9/11 DEW questions answered 16 years ago...
15:13

9/11 DEW questions answered 16 years ago...

Still today the "9/11 truther movement" plays dumb.
1 comment
14
9/11 The EVIDENCE - A discussion
1:37:43

9/11 The EVIDENCE - A discussion

Theo Chalmers interviews Dr Judy Wood On 25th Feb 2010, Theo Chalmers, on his "On the Edge" Programme discussed 9/11, Directed Energy Weapons, The Hutchison Effect, Hurricane Erin and Dr. Judy Wood's legal case against NIST's contractors.
15
9/11 Truth - Day 1 - Out of the archives (2008)
51:20

9/11 Truth - Day 1 - Out of the archives (2008)

Out of the archives…. I found this interview on what I believe to be an inactive YouTube channel of Dr Abraham Rodriguez, who called out Richard Gage and AE911T for the disinformation agents they are, way back in 2011. See the interaction here: https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7/Richard-Gage-Exposed-by-Abraham-Hafiz-Rodriguez:6 Now this interview was broken up into 7 parts (most probably due to YT not allowing long video’s 12 years ago), but part 2 is missing from the channel – I suspect that something in part 2 was flagged by YT and the video might have been deleted… It is day 1 of Dr Wood and Andrew Johnson speaking to Ambrose L. Lane on 14 January 2008, just a couple of months after her Qui-Tam case, which she filed against NIST and government subcontractors, for SCIENCE FRAUD, was unsealed. It was before all the official disinformation / conspiracy theorists started coming out of the woodwork to vehemently try to debunk Dr Wood’s work or to muddle up the discussion on WHAT happened on 9/11.
16
9/11 Truth - Day 2 - Out of the archives (2008)
49:56

9/11 Truth - Day 2 - Out of the archives (2008)

Out of the archives continued…. I found this interview on what I believe to be an inactive YouTube channel of Dr Abraham Rodriguez, who called out Richard Gage and AE911T for the disinformation agents they are, in 2011. Now this interview was broken up into 6 parts (most probably due to YT not allowing long video’s 12 years ago), but part 4 is missing from the channel – I suspect that something in part 4 was flagged by YT and the video might have been deleted… Back to the interview – It is day 2 of Dr Wood and Andrew Johnson speaking to Ambrose L. Lane on 18 January 2008, just a couple of months after her Qui-Tam case, which she filed against NIST and government subcontractors, for SCIENCE FRAUD, was “unsealed”, but on this occasion they were joined by John Hutchison, better known for his “Hutchison Effect”. It was before all the official disinformation / conspiracy theorists started coming out of the woodwork to vehemently try to “debunk” Dr Wood’s evidence and to muddle up the discussion on WHAT happened on 9/11. You need to ask yourself, in the age of censorship, why does AE911Truth and all the other thermite / nuke THEORIES not get censored, but Dr Wood does?
17
Jesse Ventura talks to Dr Judy Wood
18:24

Jesse Ventura talks to Dr Judy Wood

Wikipedia's block listed 9/11 scientist. Cancelled by Wikipedia for 14 years and counting. Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/wikipedias-block-listed-911-scientist
3 comments
Refutation of the 9/11 "truther" narratives
3:56:15

Refutation of the 9/11 "truther" narratives

A special presentation refuting 10 points of contention against DEW on 9/11 Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/refutation-of-the-911-truther-narratives Please read this article before watching the presentation I did on 10.02.2024. - https://911revision.substack.com/p/cowards-for-911-truth Get the popcorn - It was 4 hours long, refuting the following 10 points put forth against DEW being the mechanism of destruction on September 11, 2001. I dissect all 10 points he raises to try and refute DEW, which you can read about in this book. https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/ Let’s go! This is the initial background on 9/11 and then perception management. Timestamp 5 min 30 Below is the points raised against DEW, with my reply and reference to Dr Wood’s book and the discussion in the presentation with a timestamp for the full 4 hours broken down… 1.) Debris Pile Height: The claim of a too-low debris pile is debunked by recognizing that 90% of the Twin Towers' mass fell outside their footprints. Chapter 9 - Pages 171 to 196 (Timestamp 35 min23 to 57:30) 2.) Damage to Core Box Columns: DEW would need precise targeting features, making it implausible for the observed straight and horizontal breaks in core columns. Chapter 12 - Pages 247 to 256 (Timestamp 57:30 to 1h12:33) 3.) Fall of the "Spire": The assertion that steel "turned to dust" is challenged by the spire falling after being "shaken," likely by explosive charges. Chapter 8 - Pages 131 to 169 (Timestamp 1h12:33 to 1h31:30) 4.) "Toasted" Tops of Vehicles: Damage to vehicles is explained by partially unignited thermite falling through the air, not by DEW. Chapter 11 - Pages 213 to 246 (Timestamp 1h31:30 to 1h48:30) 5.) Once-Molten Iron Microspheres: The presence of molten iron spheres is explained by thermitic materials, not addressed by the DEW hypothesis. Chapter 15 - Page 321 to 339 (Timestamp 1h48:30 to 1h54:32) 6.) Molten Metal: DEW cannot explain observations of molten metal pouring from WTC 2 with temperatures exceeding those from jet fuel or office fires. Chapter 17 - Pages 349 to 394 (Timestamp 1h54:32 to 2h13:23) 7.) Active, Unignited Nano-Thermite: Discovery of nano-thermite in the dust supports the explosive/incendiary hypothesis, not explained by DEW. Chapter 7 - Pages 122 to 130 (Timestamp 2h13:23 to 2h21:08) 8.) Persistent Extreme Heat: High temperatures at Ground Zero contradict DEW proponents' denial of such temperatures. Chapter 13 - Pages 257 to 296 (Timestamp 2h21:08 to 2h47:56) 9.) Craters Observed in WTC 5 and 6: Holes in WTC 5 and 6 are attributed to falling steel, not exotic weaponry as suggested by DEW proponents. Chapter 10 - Pages 197 to 212 (Timestamp 2h47:56 to 3h08:15) 10.) Eyewitness Accounts of Multiple Explosions and Building 7: Numerous eyewitness accounts align with controlled demolition, not explained by the DEW hypothesis. Chapter 7 - Pages 95 to 130 - Timestamp 3h08:15 to 3h23:07 (Building 7 mentioned as well) Then for some closing thoughts, that are thought provoking… Timestamp 3h23:07 to 3h56:15
6 comments
19
9/11 Truth - Richard Gage vs Andrew Johnson
7:01

9/11 Truth - Richard Gage vs Andrew Johnson

REFUTATION OF GAGE'S GAME 15 years ago and again in 2023. No more nails needed for this coffin!! Read this June 2023 article by Elsa Schieder, PhD, who hosted Gage on her truth summit. Article: https://elsaiselsa.substack.com/p/dr-judy-wood-refutation-of-gages-game
20
Who is Wikipedia's block listed 9/11 scientist?
24:10

Who is Wikipedia's block listed 9/11 scientist?

Block listed since 2010. Author of the book: Where did the towers go? The ONLY independent forensic investigation of what happened to 7 buildings with a WTC prefix on 9/11 was done by Dr Judy Wood. She also sued NIST's 23 subcontractors for science fraud due to their flawed studies and reports that made up the 10 000 NIST Report, in 2007. Yet - the 9/11 "truther" movement NEVER mention her cases against NIST. NIST used a technique that is not uncommon in science fraud and the technique that they used was basically to define their objectives in such a way as to make sure that they basically did not investigate what happened. NIST set up its investigation so that the starting point was the moment after the alleged jetliners hit the towers which literally meant that they did not have to confirm that jetliners hit the towers and the fact of the matter is no jetliners did hit those towers. And then they concluded their investigation at the point where or when the towers were about to be destroyed. Here you have a 10,000-page NIST investigation that investigated everything that happened after the towers suffered damaging explosions and then ended before the towers underwent their final demise. Their language was “up to the initiation of collapse.” That is science fraud. - lawyer Jerry Leaphart. As the world slowly stirs to consider what really happened on 911, we need direct unambiguous answers. Challenge Questions/Controversy between Where Did The Towers Go and the controlled opposition traitors like Gage, Walters, Corbett, Jones, Jones, Fetzer et al. must be embraced and directly answered. Saying that the truth is important and we need to follow the evidence is like saying water is wet. Instead, something like the following must be spoken boldly and at every opportunity. The world needs to recognize that Directed Energy Weapons have been around for decades and were used on 911. About 3,000 American people were murdered by the perpetrators in order to launch unfounded wars that murdered over 4 million innocent people. We the American people, via the consent of the governed, are ultimately responsible for the actions of the UNITED STATES/United States/US FedGov. We the People have to stand up and peacefully, resolutely fix the problem. The same underlying technology demonstrated on 911 can be used to peacefully power the world with free energy or shatter it to pieces like a 1,000 mile diameter asteroid impact. The time for conscious, fully informed choice has now come. Choose you this day who you will serve.
2 comments

Refutation of the 9/11 "truther" narratives

Save
1 year ago
845
911 truth

A special presentation refuting 10 points of contention against DEW on 9/11

Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/refutation-of-the-911-truther-narratives

Please read this article before watching the presentation I did on 10.02.2024. - https://911revision.substack.com/p/cowards-for-911-truth

Get the popcorn - It was 4 hours long, refuting the following 10 points put forth against DEW being the mechanism of destruction on September 11, 2001.

I dissect all 10 points he raises to try and refute DEW, which you can read about in this book. https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/

Let’s go!

This is the initial background on 9/11 and then perception management. Timestamp 5 min 30

Below is the points raised against DEW, with my reply and reference to Dr Wood’s book and the discussion in the presentation with a timestamp for the full 4 hours broken down…

1.) Debris Pile Height: The claim of a too-low debris pile is debunked by recognizing that 90% of the Twin Towers' mass fell outside their footprints.
Chapter 9 - Pages 171 to 196 (Timestamp 35 min23 to 57:30)

2.) Damage to Core Box Columns: DEW would need precise targeting features, making it implausible for the observed straight and horizontal breaks in core columns.
Chapter 12 - Pages 247 to 256 (Timestamp 57:30 to 1h12:33)

3.) Fall of the "Spire": The assertion that steel "turned to dust" is challenged by the spire falling after being "shaken," likely by explosive charges.
Chapter 8 - Pages 131 to 169 (Timestamp 1h12:33 to 1h31:30)

4.) "Toasted" Tops of Vehicles: Damage to vehicles is explained by partially unignited thermite falling through the air, not by DEW.
Chapter 11 - Pages 213 to 246 (Timestamp 1h31:30 to 1h48:30)

5.) Once-Molten Iron Microspheres: The presence of molten iron spheres is explained by thermitic materials, not addressed by the DEW hypothesis.
Chapter 15 - Page 321 to 339 (Timestamp 1h48:30 to 1h54:32)

6.) Molten Metal: DEW cannot explain observations of molten metal pouring from WTC 2 with temperatures exceeding those from jet fuel or office fires.
Chapter 17 - Pages 349 to 394 (Timestamp 1h54:32 to 2h13:23)

7.) Active, Unignited Nano-Thermite: Discovery of nano-thermite in the dust supports the explosive/incendiary hypothesis, not explained by DEW.
Chapter 7 - Pages 122 to 130 (Timestamp 2h13:23 to 2h21:08)

8.) Persistent Extreme Heat: High temperatures at Ground Zero contradict DEW proponents' denial of such temperatures.
Chapter 13 - Pages 257 to 296 (Timestamp 2h21:08 to 2h47:56)

9.) Craters Observed in WTC 5 and 6: Holes in WTC 5 and 6 are attributed to falling steel, not exotic weaponry as suggested by DEW proponents.
Chapter 10 - Pages 197 to 212 (Timestamp 2h47:56 to 3h08:15)

10.) Eyewitness Accounts of Multiple Explosions and Building 7: Numerous eyewitness accounts align with controlled demolition, not explained by the DEW hypothesis.
Chapter 7 - Pages 95 to 130 - Timestamp 3h08:15 to 3h23:07 (Building 7 mentioned as well)

Then for some closing thoughts, that are thought provoking…
Timestamp 3h23:07 to 3h56:15

Loading 6 comments...