Building 7
911Revisionist
- 10 / 18
1
Building 7 and Greasy Larry Silverstein
10:27

Building 7 and Greasy Larry Silverstein

Building 7 didn't go down due to fires or controlled demolition. Truth seekers have been bamboozled by the "trusted experts" for nearly 2 decades. Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-operation-reason-building-7-didnt WHAT exactly happened to ALL 7 buildings with a WTC prefix on Sept 11, 2001? The following points need to be made regarding what exactly happened to the buildings and the observable evidence at ground zero, that the “9/11 truth movement” never touch on… Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/what-exactly-happened-to-all-7-buildings
1 comment
2
Building 7: A Toddlers Guide
9:11

Building 7: A Toddlers Guide

Building 7 didn't go down due to fires or controlled demolition. Truth seekers have been bamboozled by the "trusted experts" for nearly 2 decades. Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-operation-reason-building-7-didnt
 1.1K  views 4 comments
3
Understanding Building 7 - For Dummies
2:26

Understanding Building 7 - For Dummies

Building 7 didn't go down due to fires or controlled demolition. Truth seekers have been bamboozled by the "trusted experts" for nearly 2 decades. Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-operation-reason-building-7-didnt WHAT exactly happened to ALL 7 buildings with a WTC prefix on Sept 11, 2001? The following points need to be made regarding what exactly happened to the buildings and the observable evidence at ground zero, that the “9/11 truth movement” never touch on… Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/what-exactly-happened-to-all-7-buildings 9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline "The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
3 comments
4
The Lucky Larry "Pull It" Building 7 Distraction
2:26

The Lucky Larry "Pull It" Building 7 Distraction

Building 7 didn't go down due to fires or controlled demolition. Truth seekers have been bamboozled by the "trusted experts" for nearly 2 decades. Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-operation-reason-building-7-didnt WHAT exactly happened to ALL 7 buildings with a WTC prefix on Sept 11, 2001? The following points need to be made regarding what exactly happened to the buildings and the observable evidence at ground zero, that the “9/11 truth movement” never touch on… Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/what-exactly-happened-to-all-7-buildings 9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline "The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
5
Building 7 - The Great Big Bamboozle
15:36

Building 7 - The Great Big Bamboozle

You have NOT been given all the FACTS on Building 7 Full 2h presentation: https://rumble.com/v4i91h9-a-conversation-regarding-building-7.html Building 7 - 47 stories - 230 000 tons Seattle King Dome - 20 stories high - the dome weight approx 130 000 tons Seattle Kingdome stats - https://special.seattletimes.com/o/special/kingdome/k_gravity.html Domeless in Seattle: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9mOQTyh1sG0 Building 7 – A thought experiment: https://rumble.com/v4hsghu-building-7-a-thought-experiment.html - 14 minutes The truthers vs seismic readings: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truthers-vs-the-seismic-evidence - Just show Bankers Trust Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-anomalous-bankers-trust-building - just show real quick The 9/11 Building 7 HOAX video Making fun of the proponents of conventional controlled demolition since 2011 Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-building-7-hoax-video-of-2011 Dr Wood: A 2023 Building 7 discussion on the evidence: https://rumble.com/v3yuxa4-a-2023-building-7-discussion-on-the-evidence.html
 1.63K  views 4 comments
6
Building 7 - A WAKE UP CALL Discussion
1:53:55

Building 7 - A WAKE UP CALL Discussion

Building 7 did NOT go down to fire or explosives
7
Building 7 - A thought Experiment
13:53

Building 7 - A thought Experiment

There are various points with regards to Building 7 that are purposefully kept from 9/11 truht seekers buy the so called "9/11 truth movement". They DONT want you to know this! The 9/11 Building 7 HOAX video Making fun of the proponents of conventional controlled demolition since 2011 Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-building-7-hoax-video-of-2011
7 comments
8
What makes a 9/11 truth seeker?
9:48

What makes a 9/11 truth seeker?

Why are people afraid to seek REAL truth? Why keep your head buried in the sand? 9/11 was an attack on human consciousness. People need to realise, they live in a time where their perceptions are being managed. Just like with Covid from 2020 to 2023, people outsourced their thinking way too easily to the government and MSM and in turn the so called "truther" movement - As there are bad actors in the alternative media, aka "truther" movements, especially when it comes to the events of September 11, 2001. There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11: 1. POOR Problem solving skills 2. Group Think (Peer Pressure, running with the herd) 3. They just can't handle the implications (they wish it weren't true)
2 comments
9
Exposed in 2011 - Richard Gage
16:59

Exposed in 2011 - Richard Gage

A lot of narratives around the events of 9/11 needs to be urgently revisited. 9/11 was an attack on human consciousness. You live in a time where your perception is being managed. Just like with Covid from 2020 to 2023, people outsourced their thinking way too easily. You can download the Refutation of Richard Gage’s Game in 2008 AND 2023: https://truthsummit.info/media-files/DrJudyWood-refutation-RichardGage-claims.pdf 9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline "The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline The molecular dissociation of the thermite & nuke theories People are so easily led by perceived "experts". Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-controlled-demolition-of-thermite
Refutation of the 9/11 "truther" narratives
3:56:15

Refutation of the 9/11 "truther" narratives

A special presentation refuting 10 points of contention against DEW on 9/11 Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/refutation-of-the-911-truther-narratives Please read this article before watching the presentation I did on 10.02.2024. - https://911revision.substack.com/p/cowards-for-911-truth Get the popcorn - It was 4 hours long, refuting the following 10 points put forth against DEW being the mechanism of destruction on September 11, 2001. I dissect all 10 points he raises to try and refute DEW, which you can read about in this book. https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/ Let’s go! This is the initial background on 9/11 and then perception management. Timestamp 5 min 30 Below is the points raised against DEW, with my reply and reference to Dr Wood’s book and the discussion in the presentation with a timestamp for the full 4 hours broken down… 1.) Debris Pile Height: The claim of a too-low debris pile is debunked by recognizing that 90% of the Twin Towers' mass fell outside their footprints. Chapter 9 - Pages 171 to 196 (Timestamp 35 min23 to 57:30) 2.) Damage to Core Box Columns: DEW would need precise targeting features, making it implausible for the observed straight and horizontal breaks in core columns. Chapter 12 - Pages 247 to 256 (Timestamp 57:30 to 1h12:33) 3.) Fall of the "Spire": The assertion that steel "turned to dust" is challenged by the spire falling after being "shaken," likely by explosive charges. Chapter 8 - Pages 131 to 169 (Timestamp 1h12:33 to 1h31:30) 4.) "Toasted" Tops of Vehicles: Damage to vehicles is explained by partially unignited thermite falling through the air, not by DEW. Chapter 11 - Pages 213 to 246 (Timestamp 1h31:30 to 1h48:30) 5.) Once-Molten Iron Microspheres: The presence of molten iron spheres is explained by thermitic materials, not addressed by the DEW hypothesis. Chapter 15 - Page 321 to 339 (Timestamp 1h48:30 to 1h54:32) 6.) Molten Metal: DEW cannot explain observations of molten metal pouring from WTC 2 with temperatures exceeding those from jet fuel or office fires. Chapter 17 - Pages 349 to 394 (Timestamp 1h54:32 to 2h13:23) 7.) Active, Unignited Nano-Thermite: Discovery of nano-thermite in the dust supports the explosive/incendiary hypothesis, not explained by DEW. Chapter 7 - Pages 122 to 130 (Timestamp 2h13:23 to 2h21:08) 8.) Persistent Extreme Heat: High temperatures at Ground Zero contradict DEW proponents' denial of such temperatures. Chapter 13 - Pages 257 to 296 (Timestamp 2h21:08 to 2h47:56) 9.) Craters Observed in WTC 5 and 6: Holes in WTC 5 and 6 are attributed to falling steel, not exotic weaponry as suggested by DEW proponents. Chapter 10 - Pages 197 to 212 (Timestamp 2h47:56 to 3h08:15) 10.) Eyewitness Accounts of Multiple Explosions and Building 7: Numerous eyewitness accounts align with controlled demolition, not explained by the DEW hypothesis. Chapter 7 - Pages 95 to 130 - Timestamp 3h08:15 to 3h23:07 (Building 7 mentioned as well) Then for some closing thoughts, that are thought provoking… Timestamp 3h23:07 to 3h56:15
6 comments
11
Were the twin towers & building 7 a conventional controlled demolition on 9/11?
5:52

Were the twin towers & building 7 a conventional controlled demolition on 9/11?

Thought experiment. Conventional controlled demolitions vs what we saw on Sept 11, 2001. Can you spot the difference? What do you hear or don't hear when comparing the two towers to conventional controlled demolitions? Building 7 didn't go down due to fires or controlled demolition. Truth seekers have been bamboozled by the "trusted experts" for nearly 2 decades. Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-operation-reason-building-7-didnt Is the 9/11 "truth" movement a distraction movement? What happens if you ask TRUTH questions? Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/questions-for-the-911-truther-talking
1 comment
12
A 2023 Building 7 discussion on the evidence
14:44

A 2023 Building 7 discussion on the evidence

Building 7 in a nutshel
13
Building 7, the Ted Walter cut (International Center for 9/11 justice, suppression)
4:49

Building 7, the Ted Walter cut (International Center for 9/11 justice, suppression)

The anomaly the 9/11 "truther movement" cannot answer
14
The 9/11 cult has their eyes set on Russell Brand.
18:06

The 9/11 cult has their eyes set on Russell Brand.

We need to save Russell Brand from the cult! The 9/11 cult has their eyes set on Russell Brand. Read the article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/we-need-to-save-russel-brand-from
15
Building 7 - The TRUTH cut 3.0 (The Epic Version)
5:58

Building 7 - The TRUTH cut 3.0 (The Epic Version)

Building 7 didn't go down due to fires or controlled demolition. Truth seekers have been bamboozled by the "trusted experts" for nearly 2 decades. Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-operation-reason-building-7-didnt Building 7: The REAL Truth Cut After 22 years, let's break it down in less than 10 minutes - This is how they DEW'd it... https://911revision.substack.com/p/building-7-the-real-truth-cut An EPIC rework of my first B7 video by @MathEasySolns (X / Twitter) - Telegram: https://t.me/meslinks
16
Building 7 - The REAL TRUTH cut
9:36

Building 7 - The REAL TRUTH cut

Building 7 - The TRUTH cut (9/11 Revisionist) https://911revision.substack.com/ This is how they DEW'd it...
17
Understanding 9/11 for dummies
37:05

Understanding 9/11 for dummies

Ever since September 11, 2001 people have been outsourcing their thinking. Listen to what Professor Morgan Reynolds' 2009 Qui-Tam case was about. Discussing air pressure, drag, aerodynamics and then let’s also look at the fraudulent NIST aeroplane impact report as well as the planted aeroplane fuselage and debris at the WTC complex… And by the end of the video, SAIC and their “specialisation in impacts and explosions” and you’ll see they gave NIST fraudulent impact reports pertaining to the “planes” that supposedly hit the towers. People also seem to struggle wrapping their brains around what the buildings were built with and that there is no way in hell, aluminium can cut through steel, like a hot knife through butter... Just exactly what did those "planes" have to go through? Anyone that believes jet fuel, explosives, thermite, buried nukes, mini nukes were used, most probably also still believe in fairies, unicorns and santa claus. Open up your mind, LOOK at what is being presented to you in this video and be sure to put on your thinking cap, because a large proportion of people have fallen for the trap of the cover up, believing that the 9/11 "truther" movement are actually looking to expose the truth of WHAT happened to 8 buildings with a WTC prefix on September 11, 2001 - Americans, WAKE THE FUCK UP! Ask yourself the question, WHAT are all the 9/11 "truther" talking heads really doing, whilst asking for donations and talking absolute bullshit? Why, after nearly 22 years, do we still have such a strong cover-up with regards to the events of September 11, 2001? Why does the 9/11 "truther" movement and Wikipedia not want you to know about the 2009 US Supreme Court Qui-Tam cases? Top 5 Facts About September 11th, 2001 - Look into the work of Dr Judy Wood and Andrew Johnson and STOP outsourcing your thinking to the psy-op, that is the 9/11 "truther" movement.
18
Building 7 - The uncomfortable TRUTH
9:51

Building 7 - The uncomfortable TRUTH

So, after lambasting people for donations for the last 16 years, there are FACTS about WTC7 that AE911Truth / Richard Gage and the whole "truther" movement NEVER dares mention. Find more uncensored content on this Odysee channel: @911revisited:7

Refutation of the 9/11 "truther" narratives

Save
1 year ago
841
911 truth

A special presentation refuting 10 points of contention against DEW on 9/11

Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/refutation-of-the-911-truther-narratives

Please read this article before watching the presentation I did on 10.02.2024. - https://911revision.substack.com/p/cowards-for-911-truth

Get the popcorn - It was 4 hours long, refuting the following 10 points put forth against DEW being the mechanism of destruction on September 11, 2001.

I dissect all 10 points he raises to try and refute DEW, which you can read about in this book. https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/

Let’s go!

This is the initial background on 9/11 and then perception management. Timestamp 5 min 30

Below is the points raised against DEW, with my reply and reference to Dr Wood’s book and the discussion in the presentation with a timestamp for the full 4 hours broken down…

1.) Debris Pile Height: The claim of a too-low debris pile is debunked by recognizing that 90% of the Twin Towers' mass fell outside their footprints.
Chapter 9 - Pages 171 to 196 (Timestamp 35 min23 to 57:30)

2.) Damage to Core Box Columns: DEW would need precise targeting features, making it implausible for the observed straight and horizontal breaks in core columns.
Chapter 12 - Pages 247 to 256 (Timestamp 57:30 to 1h12:33)

3.) Fall of the "Spire": The assertion that steel "turned to dust" is challenged by the spire falling after being "shaken," likely by explosive charges.
Chapter 8 - Pages 131 to 169 (Timestamp 1h12:33 to 1h31:30)

4.) "Toasted" Tops of Vehicles: Damage to vehicles is explained by partially unignited thermite falling through the air, not by DEW.
Chapter 11 - Pages 213 to 246 (Timestamp 1h31:30 to 1h48:30)

5.) Once-Molten Iron Microspheres: The presence of molten iron spheres is explained by thermitic materials, not addressed by the DEW hypothesis.
Chapter 15 - Page 321 to 339 (Timestamp 1h48:30 to 1h54:32)

6.) Molten Metal: DEW cannot explain observations of molten metal pouring from WTC 2 with temperatures exceeding those from jet fuel or office fires.
Chapter 17 - Pages 349 to 394 (Timestamp 1h54:32 to 2h13:23)

7.) Active, Unignited Nano-Thermite: Discovery of nano-thermite in the dust supports the explosive/incendiary hypothesis, not explained by DEW.
Chapter 7 - Pages 122 to 130 (Timestamp 2h13:23 to 2h21:08)

8.) Persistent Extreme Heat: High temperatures at Ground Zero contradict DEW proponents' denial of such temperatures.
Chapter 13 - Pages 257 to 296 (Timestamp 2h21:08 to 2h47:56)

9.) Craters Observed in WTC 5 and 6: Holes in WTC 5 and 6 are attributed to falling steel, not exotic weaponry as suggested by DEW proponents.
Chapter 10 - Pages 197 to 212 (Timestamp 2h47:56 to 3h08:15)

10.) Eyewitness Accounts of Multiple Explosions and Building 7: Numerous eyewitness accounts align with controlled demolition, not explained by the DEW hypothesis.
Chapter 7 - Pages 95 to 130 - Timestamp 3h08:15 to 3h23:07 (Building 7 mentioned as well)

Then for some closing thoughts, that are thought provoking…
Timestamp 3h23:07 to 3h56:15

Loading 6 comments...