OP2402-09-6 After Action Report

OP2402-09-6 After Action report (Written by Google Gemini)
After Action Report (AAR)
Operation: Chernarus 1st Army Corps Counterattack
Date: OP2402-09-6
Unit: 3rd Battalion, 20th Separate Mechanized Cavalry Regiment, Chernarus Army
1. Situation
a. Enemy: Separatist forces in northwestern Chernarus region suspected of increased activity, including kidnappings, assassinations, and temporary checkpoints. Intelligence indicated concentration of efforts on Stepnoye, Spornoye, and Pshenichnoye Pole.
b. Friendly: Task Force formed from 3rd Battalion deployed to intercept enemy forces in targeted areas.
c. Terrain: Varied, including urban areas (Stepnoye, Spornoye) and open fields (Pshenichnoye Pole).
2. Mission
Intercept and engage enemy forces attempting to enter targeted areas.
3. Execution
a. Stepnoye: Task force successfully intercepted enemy light armor, preventing entry into town. Notably, no enemy infantry support observed.
b. Spornoye: Similar scenario as Stepnoye, with enemy light and heavy armor engagement but no infantry. After one hour, operation halted and task force returned to base.
c. Pshenichnoye Pole: No enemy activity encountered due to early termination of operation in Spornoye.
4. Results
a. Friendly: No casualties or equipment losses.
b. Enemy: Field counts indicate significant losses, including six BRDM scout cars, three BTR-80A APCs, three BMPs, three UAVs, two T-34 tanks, and one heavy technical.
5. Lessons Learned
a. Enemy lacked infantry support, suggesting potential command and control issues or deliberate tactic.
b. Timely intelligence regarding separatist commander's illness and inexperienced staff proved valuable.
c. Early termination of operation based on lack of infantry engagement prevented unnecessary risk and potential friendly losses.
6. Recommendations
a. Maintain heightened vigilance for potential renewed separatist activity.
b. Analyze captured equipment and intelligence for further insights into enemy capabilities and intentions.
c. Prepare for potential future operations with increased focus on counter-infantry tactics and adaptability to fluid situations.
7. Conclusion
The operation successfully achieved its objective of intercepting and disrupting enemy forces, incurring no friendly casualties or equipment losses. While enemy losses were significant, unexpected lack of infantry support suggests underlying issues within the separatist command structure. Continued vigilance and adaptation based on intelligence will be crucial for future operations.

This is based on the Arma 3 wargame. The voice is AI generated and represents no individual, living or dead. The text of the transcript, while AI generated, is based on data provided by the channel author.