Premium Only Content

197: Google vs. Publishers part 2 -- Search
This 2nd in a 4-part series gives some perspective on how publishing got into its current mess with artificial intelligence.
Part 1 - copyright
Part 2 - search
Part 3 - generative AI
Part 4 -- what's next
Part 2 – The Search Bargain
The Internet was a new way to reach audiences and to monetize content – mostly with ads, which were very profitable at the time.
Search became the gateway, or the discovery tool. But it didn’t start like that.
Before good search, sites were categorized at a high level in directories. Google changed all that with excellent search.
Search engines would crawl websites, scrape the content, index it, and then visitors would search against that index. Search became the main discovery tool.
Publishers should not have gone along with this.
Google’s mission is to organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful. That means free. The Google bias is towards free content supported by ads. Which they control.
Google rules search. Nobody else is even close. That means Google controls content discovery, so if you want to be found on the internet, you have to follow Google’s rules.
Publishers have many different choices for how to monetize their content. Google has created an environment that heavily biases things towards one model – that is, free content supported by ads controlled by Google.
This has created a perception with the public that content ought to be free. This expectation that content should be free lowers the perceived value of content.
The funny thing is that Google needs this content – which they don’t create. Publishers have always had leverage here, but they’re never used it. They’ve allowed to write the rules of the game.
The whole industry is infected. As the gatekeeper of discovery and the dominant player in the ad space, Google’s perspective wins. It’s not just their doing. As I said in Part 1, most of Big Tech believes in this idea of free content supported by ads, and that’s infected all content delivery platforms.
Consider podcasts. The default assumption is that you get the podcast for free. It’s very difficult to integrate podcasts into a membership or subscription model.
The bottom line is that Google and other Big Tech companies have a set of interests that do not align with the interests of publishers and content creators.
In Part 3 I’ll discuss how generative AI has made this mess even more complicated.
-
LIVE
StoneMountain64
1 hour agoBattlefield 6 News and Extraction Gaming
179 watching -
24:15
Stephen Gardner
1 hour agoCharlie Kirk Bombshell: Fresh Video Footage Shatters the Narrative!😱
33 -
9:51
Silver Dragons
1 hour agoSILVER PRICE SOARING - Is Silver In the END GAME Now?
5.48K3 -
1:28:13
Russell Brand
4 hours agoThe Truth About UK Corruption – Andrew Bridgen Speaks Out - SF640
157K32 -
2:11:52
Side Scrollers Podcast
4 hours agoYouTube ADMITS BLATANT Censorship + California Wants to FINE “Hate Speech” + More | Side Scrollers
45.2K1 -
15:26
Simply Bitcoin
1 day ago $0.17 earned$60 Trillion Incoming? | Why Gold & Bonds are Screaming "BUY BITCOIN"
11.4K3 -
1:55:59
The Charlie Kirk Show
3 hours agoDebunking the Lies and Smears about Charlie | ThoughtCrime Team | 9.25.2025
82K59 -
1:05:27
Sean Unpaved
3 hours agoCup Swings, Homer Kings, & TNF Zzzz's
16K2 -
8:13
It’s the Final Round
8 hours ago $0.08 earned💰Seahawks vs Cardinals Best Bets🔥Player Prop Picks, Parlays,Predictions FREE Thursday September 25th
12K -
27:22
Rethinking the Dollar
2 hours agoSilver at $45: Is War the Spark for $100 Silver? | Thursday News Update
13.2K1