SCOTUS Arguments: Murthy v. Missouri

Save
Streamed on:
735

#SCOTUS #missourivbiden #murthyvmissouri #potentiallycriminal

During the response to COVID-19 and the 2020 election, multiple Executive level agencies consulted and confronted social media companies like Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube on the idea that they were providing "disinformation" and sought the assistance of these companies to silence statements the Executive Branch did not like.

The States of Missouri and Louisiana (and multiple medical doctors suing in their private capacity) sought an injunction to stop these agencies and the White House from coercing the social media companies. This ultimately resulted in the 5th Circuit issuing an injunction against the White House and multiple Executive level agencies from contacting the social media companies...outside of limited topics.

This was argued in front of SCOTUS on March 19, 2024

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
MERCH
https://potentiallycriminal.creator-spring.com

SUPPORT
*Venmo: sean-martin-462
*Zelle: [email protected]

CONTACT
* Email - [email protected]
* Actual Mail - PO Box 716, Willoughby, OH 44096

LINKS
*Locals - https://potentiallycriminal.locals.com
*Rumble - https://rumble.com/PotentiallyCriminal
*Odysee - https://odysee.com/@PotentiallyCriminal
*Twitch - https://www.twitch.tv/potentially_criminal
*BitChute - https://bitchute.com/potentially_criminal/
*Discord - https://discord.gg/5VyZZNHk
*Website - www.seanpmartinlaw.com

Nothing in the commentary or responses provided by Sean P. Martin, Esq., Martin Media LLC, or Martin Law Office LLC, expressly or implied, shall be deemed to be legal advice and shall not be construed as the creation of an attorney-client relationship in any way. The viewer has responsibility of obtaining legal advise from an competent and licensed attorney, and is urged to do so. Support of this channel or purchase of any affiliated products or services does not constitute the creation of an attorney-client relationship. Any opinions expressed herein are my own and do not reflect those of any organization, association or group.

All references or clips that may be used on this channel are for fair use commentary, criticism, and educational purposes. See Hughes v. Benjamin, 437 F. Supp. 3d 382 (S.D.N.Y. 2020); Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015).

Copyright Martin Media LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Want to create live streams like this? Check out StreamYard: https://streamyard.com/pal/d/5660283745075200

Loading 1 comment...