Christian scholar makes SHOCKING admissions! - V. FUNNY ENDiNG || Mohammed Hijab

Christian researcher makes a series of admissions about both the Bible and the Quran and is forced into a corner in a debate. The researcher has been studying Christian primary source source material (sometimes in the original languages) and has come to a conclusion that 'the Bible has been changed in many places'. After also studying the compilation of the Quran he is confident that the Quran has not been 'changed'. The reasoning he gives for this reality is particularly peculiar and could be seen as a desperate attempt to make sense of the changes/omissions in the biblical text. After asserting that the reason the Quran is unchanged is because ' the devil has left it that way' since ' it has had a ' weak effect' he forgets to use the same logic with the Septuagint (which he also asserts is unchanged). After he decisively loses the debate he moves away from logic and exclaims ' we are not saved by logic but by a person', which will make one think why he was engaging in a logical kind of debate in the first place? or if he would have said the same thing if the roles had been reversed?