Considering Charlotte - Legitimacy of the General Conference of the UMC Questions

As the General Conference session draws nearer, we realize we have covered the primary topics needed to know what is going on. For now, we wanted to do our best to speak to what different voices are doing to influence what the plenary session of the Conference will be doing. We talk about the disagreements between Rob Renfroe and Good News with Mainstream UMC and Mark Holland, as well as the SCCCM and their representatives. Is it true that nonAmerican churches can already disaffiliate from the UMC without a new disciplinary provision? Is Holland's objection to a denomination-wide provision legitimate? And what is to be said with the large number of African delegates who will be unable to attend?

We cover a lot of ground in this session, so consider spending some time with us. If you know of folks who just want to understand what is going on in this complicated picture, consider sharing it with a friend. Let us know if you think we are missing something.

Links:
To download a copy of Lonnie's Matrix of Petitions, go to https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1KTnzUbOO6NORahwa_nrdxKV1ftNxUQpQ/edit?usp=share_link&ouid=117124792218903575974&rtpof=true&sd=true
Mark Holland's response to accusations of racism - https://mainstreamumc.com/blog/recap-threats-and-white-supremacy/
WCA article alleging "separate but equal" segregation of Mainstream UMC - https://wesleyancovenant.org/2024/04/02/give-us-two-and-a-half-minutes-thats-all-2min-30-seconds/
Rob Renfroe's UMNS Commentary - https://www.umnews.org/en/news/traditionalist-caucus-president-speaks-to-criticism
Rebuttal from Christine Schnieder - https://www.umnews.org/en/news/central-conferences-already-have-exit-paths