Matthew Monfore vs SD Swamp Fall River BBQ

Matthew Monfore vs SD Swamp Fall River BBQ

https://rumble.com/v4v6mho-matthew-monfore-vs-sd-swamp-fall-river-bbq.html

1. Sen. Walsh (Noem appointee) begins swearing after it is exposed legislators are voting pro-porn.
2. Fact Check. Walsh was wrong..

"Supreme Court leaves in place a Texas law requiring pornographic websites to verify users’ ages"

https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-pornography-age-verification-texas-9c31eca983bdb30d3696cd4c5891a392

"Similar age verification laws have passed in other states, including Arkansas, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, Oklahoma, Utah and Virginia."

The bill in question is HB 1257 to ban internet pornography for children Under 18 in South Dakota
https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/24615/264118

Sen. Walsh did indeed vote against the Bill. He asked in the video if I was an attorney. I am not. But I did supply the most comprehensive testimony on the bill at the legislature, and there were attorneys who supported this Bill, Rep. Soye, Rep. Hansen, and Rep. Odenbach.

Sen. Walsh is trying to “save face” by stating that he stood for a “smoke out”, which ended with the RINOs gutting the Bill and turning it into a “Summer Study” (toothless)

This Ban has passed in several states. And Porn Hub has ceased, in certain cases.

4.10 Walsh Blows Up
4.55 Ladners Leave
8.42 Walsh Question
13.30 Walsh goes up to Matthew

My original Testimony for the Legislature is here:
“***Hello. This is My Pornography Testimony for Age Verification Law HB 1257 in the South Dakota Senate Judiciary Committee for tomorrow, Thursday, Feb. 29th, 2024 ; including my personal experience, the law's Constitutionality, and porn's harms on brains, etc...
video and written, abailable on my Rumble Channel. https://rumble.com/v4g6ozr-2024-matthew-monfore-porn-bill-testimony-south-dakota-legislature.html “

This is the email I Sent to Legislators after Walsh, et al killed it:
“Please support the Porn age verification bill HB 1257. Smoke out-majority to override the Senate Judiciary egregious vote.
. Pornography is ruining our children. Those voting against are perverted.

The Opponents were dishonest in their testimony.
The Bill HAS withstood legal Scrutiny

1. Louisiana Federal Judge dismissed the challenge
a. https://apnews.com/article/porn-lawsuit-age-verification-louisiana-bbdf1afdc5c09feb104fe4199e20c22d
2. Utah Federal Judge dismissed the challenge
a. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/utah-law-requiring-age-verification-for-porn-sites-remains-in-effect-after-judge-dismisses-lawsuit
3. Texas Court of Appeal Staid the Injuncction
a. https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/news/releases/attorney-general-ken-paxton-wins-major-victory-protecting-children-obscene-materials
b. currently suing porn companies
i. https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/news/releases/attorney-general-ken-paxton-sues-major-pornography-distributor-violating-texas-age-verification-laws
The Civil Route was taken due to 1st Amendment concerns
You can listen to the robust debate in the original state of Louisiana
*also Addresses how the technology works, and why Civil Action is used.
https://house.louisiana.gov/h_video/VideoArchivePlayer?v=house/2022/apr/0418_22_CL
The technology protects privacy by not storing it. “