Climate Facts - Introduction

In the ongoing debate about climate change, there is a growing need for a balanced approach that separates scientific inquiry from political agendas. This essay argues that climate science should be less political, and climate policies should be more scientific. Scientists should openly address uncertainties and exaggerations in their predictions of global warming, while politicians should dispassionately count the real costs as well as the imagined benefits of their policy measures. 

References

- Curry, J. A. (2011). Climate science and the uncertainty monster. *Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society*, 92(12), 1667-1682.

- Heritage Foundation. (2019). *Economic Costs of Carbon Regulations*. Retrieved from [Heritage Foundation] (https://www.heritage.org/).

- Lomborg, B. (2020). *False Alarm: How Climate Change Panic Costs Us Trillions, Hurts the Poor, and Fails to Fix the Planet*. Basic Books.

- Pielke Jr., R. A. (2007). *The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics*. Cambridge University Press.

- Copenhagen Consensus Center. (2015). *Climate Change: Research and Analysis*. Retrieved from [Copenhagen Consensus] (https://www.copenhagenconsensus.com/).