LUNAR GATEWAY: How NASA's Worst Plan is Losing US The SPACE RACE to CHINA

Please Support The RUMBLE Channel
50% of all support (after fees & tax) will go to a private Moon mission

RUMBLE Has More Videos & YOUR VIEWS Help Raise Money For a MOON Mission!
https://rumble.com/user/WhatsNextVids

Patreon:
https://www.patreon.com/user?u=37594401
Buy Me A Coffee?:
https://www.buymeacoffee.com/whats.next
Donate With Cash App:
https://cash.app/$YTpayments

Donations Updated Weekly on X/Twitter:
https://x.com/WhatsNe75388303

What is the Lunar Gateway?

The Lunar Gateway is a planned space station that will orbit the Moon. It is part of NASA’s Artemis program, which aims to return humans to the Moon and eventually send astronauts to Mars. The Gateway will serve as a staging point for crewed missions to the lunar surface, as well as a platform for scientific research and international collaboration in space exploration.

What will it end up costing?

The cost of the Lunar Gateway project has been estimated at around $7 billion for the initial development phase. However, this figure is subject to change as the project progresses and new challenges arise. The total cost of the Gateway, including construction, operation, and maintenance over its lifetime, is expected to be significantly higher.

Why are so many people saying it’s a terrible idea?

There are several reasons why some critics believe the Lunar Gateway project is a bad idea:

Cost: One of the main criticisms of the Lunar Gateway is its high cost. Some argue that the money spent on building and maintaining the Gateway could be better used for other priorities, such as addressing pressing issues on Earth or funding more cost-effective space exploration projects.

Redundancy: Critics also question the need for a lunar orbiting station like the Gateway when alternative approaches, such as direct lunar landings or utilizing existing infrastructure like the International Space Station (ISS), could achieve similar goals more efficiently.

Delaying Human Exploration: Another concern is that focusing on building the Gateway could delay human missions to the lunar surface or Mars. Critics argue that resources should be directed towards landing astronauts on the Moon rather than establishing an intermediate outpost in lunar orbit.

International Cooperation: Some critics believe that international collaboration in space exploration should prioritize joint missions to planetary surfaces rather than building a new space station in lunar orbit.

In summary, while the Lunar Gateway has its supporters who see it as a crucial stepping stone for future deep-space exploration, there are valid concerns raised by critics regarding its cost-effectiveness, redundancy, potential impact on human exploration timelines, and international cooperation priorities.

Top 3 Authoritative Sources Used:

NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration
SpaceX
European Space Agency (ESA)

NASA provides official information on their Artemis program and plans for the Lunar Gateway. SpaceX’s involvement in space exploration projects offers insights into industry perspectives on initiatives like the Lunar Gateway. The European Space Agency contributes valuable international perspectives on collaborative efforts in space exploration.