'Weird Argument…': Pro-Abortion X Account Tries Making The Case For Babies Tossed In Dumpsters

Posted • August 1, 2024: It should come as no surprise to any of you Dear Readers that abortion advocates lie through their dang teeth. Anything to support the narrative, right? But this is now becoming far too egregious to ignore or dismiss with a derisive laugh and a sardonic shake of the head. A popular pro-abortion account on X had this to say about a recent case where an 18-year-old woman gave birth and threw her child into a dumpster like he was nothing more than literal trash. Students for Life of America | Pro-Life Gen @StudentsforLife: “This newborn baby was found in a dumpster in Houston, Texas. "The child appeared to be fresh out of the womb, with his hair wet, his skin pruned and his umbilical cord still attached." Thankfully, he survived & is expected to be OK. As horrific as this video is to watch, let this be a reminder that we need to stand up for children in our nation now more than ever, inside and outside of the womb.”

AbortionChat @AbortionChat: “….we literally tried to warn you that this is what happens when abortion access isn’t accessible.” -- Because it's totally a winning argument to say that if abortion is illegal, that you're not going to be allowed to KILL your child before they're born, you'll throw your babies in the trash. That's not insane at all. Not only is this bat-crap crazy, but this woman, Lynne Schmidt according to her bio, is conveniently leaving out key parts of this story in an effort to appeal to her base. And as of this writing, 18 million people have viewed her post on X. -- skeen 🎀 @scenerieslol Replying to @AbortionChat: “question i dont see anyone asking since they’re too busy waffling about accountability and religious beliefs- who’s going to take care of this child now? what sort of life will it live?” -- According to pro-choice leftists, if someone MIGHT MAYBE have a difficult life, this warrants killing them before they're ever born.

Nevermind the pesky little fact that these people are not Miss Cleo and cannot predict the future with any degree of accuracy. So if we don't murder them early, they'll be left to die later? Weird argument. Isn't it? Just so we’re clear, they’re mad a baby wasn’t ripped apart in utero. So… A newborn baby is found, alive, in a dumpster. And you think the solution is to actually kìll the baby? Better to be deàd than abandoned but surviving? Make that make sense. It already makes sense, but it's monstrous. Lynne is saying that had the mother chosen to kill her child in utero, this would have never happened. While true, this is horrendous logic to any sane and rational person. It's like saying that Ted Bundy's victims would have never been murdered if their mothers had gotten to them first.

Now, here is the information that Lynne has deliberately chosen NOT to tell her following: this 18-year-old woman went through a full-term pregnancy, chose not to abort, but gave birth to and then discarded her newborn baby in a dumpster because she 'had no choice'. According to media reports, she didn't want her boyfriend to break up with her. It's worth repeating: she chose not to abort. She chose to carry her baby to term. And then she chose to throw that little boy away like he was trash. This had nothing to do with abortion laws in Texas whatsoever. Child is thrown in the trash and survives. Pro-aborts: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GTayw7QWwAAPps4?format=jpg&name=small (…)

• More at: Twitchy - 'Weird Argument…': Pro-Abortion X Account Tries Making the Case for Babies Tossed in Dumpsters
https://twitchy.com/laura-w/2024/08/01/abortionchat-spreads-misinformation-n2399109