Exposed: Fake Temperature Data?

Hey everyone. Steve Milloy here. For the first time that I ever seen, the media has admitted that climate hoaxers are literally just making up temperature data and pretending that the made-up temperatures are real.

In this article comparing this year’s global temperature with last year’s global temperature, Bloomberg admitted: quote, “NASA and NOAA rely on a statistical analysis of the likely temperatures to fill in the gaps," end quote. Did you catch that? “Likely temperatures”? What’s a “likely temperature?

A “likely temperature” is an estimated or just made-up temperature. What do I mean by that? Here’s an example from the Belle Glade, Florida temperature station. Note the temperatures in the red box. They are all followed by the letter “E”, meaning estimated. For some unexplained reason, all the temperature data from the Belle Glade station has been estimated or made-up -- not measured – since 2006.

This is not just some localized problem at the Belle Glade station. As my friend Tony Heller has previously revealed at his web site RealClimateScience.com, almost 50 percent of the temperature data in the US Historical Climate Network are “estimated,” meaning just made up, or fabricated or faked? Why do they fabricate temperatures? Does it matter? You decide.

Tony Heller also produced this graph showing the effect of the fabricated data. The effect of the fabrication is to cool the past and warm the present so as to create a warming trend where there is none in the actually measured data. I doubt this is accidental.

So when you see climate hoaxers engaging in temperature debate kabuki – like trying to trying to figure out whether this year was warmer than last year – you can take comfort in the reality that they are essentially arguing about which wolf is worse, the one in Little Red Riding Hood or the one in the Three Little Pigs.