Vertitgo Politix: On Miscegenation

Displacement is an entirely different thing from genocide. In mechanics or in population, displacement means substituting one substance for another. Those who seek genocide prefer mixing to displacement: their object is not to SUBSTITUTE, their object is to DESTROY.

You can't say 'racism' is wrong and then vow to destroy race. Destroying people's identity, essential or chosen, is a satanic idea from the beginning. 'We will undermine every collective identity except our own' - is what Satan, the Illuminati, and even the Borg preach. Its evil.

It is immoral to destroy what you appreciate, and it is immoral to destroy what you can't reproduce.

The antiWhite say if a non-White wants blonds you should learn to appreciate whatever results--or is destroyed. That is the definition of malevolence and hostility: knowingly doing harm to others that you deliberately avoid for your own. The product of miscegenation is generally ugly children and a dead society.

No virtue signaller could care less about the life that a miscegenated child will have to lead than a leftist does.

It is not by accident that beggary and miscegenation are pillars of Political Correctness. The worst kind of greed is the greed that coerces Whites to want 'compassion' for their nonwhite brethren. It is this compassion that is the real reason for the “browning” of America.

Immigration and integration and miscegenation became the Final Solution to "the race problem." But this "race problem" existed ONLY in white countries and this "race problem" existed in ALL White countries.
No one says that "the race problem" will be solved by miscegenation in Asia or Africa. No one asks to massive third world immigration into Japan or Taiwan or the unpopulated areas of Africa or Brazil.
Mirror: https://archive.org/details/vertigo-politix-archive
Posted for educative purposes under THE FAIR USE NOTICE: These Videos may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode​
"Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use." Disclaimer: 17 Notwithstanding the Provisions of Sections 17 U.S.C. @ 106 and 17 U.S.C. @ 106A, the Fair Use of a Copyrighted work for Educational Purposes- Not For Profit-Non-Commercial.