Can a bad case come to a good decision?

Federal limitations on gun possession have been a sticking point among the Second Amendment community for decades. I know several groups and law firms that have been looking for the perfect case to challenge these laws. Instead, Zackey Rahimi got his case to the Supreme Court first.

This case seems to be full of contradictions. On the one hand, we have §922(g)(8), which states that someone who has a court order of protection because of a finding of a credible threat to the physical safety of another cannot lawfully possess a firearm or ammunition. However, even though the subject of the order must have the opportunity to participate in a hearing before the order is issued, there is apparently no requirement that they receive due process during the hearing.

Read the full article... watch and learn from Constitutional Expert Paul Engel; there is always much more to learn back at America Out Loud: https://www.americaoutloud.news/.