9/11 Explosions in the buildings irrefutable witness evidence

As the 23rd anniversary of 9/11 comes around, it is astouding and sickening that the 'official' explanation for how the 3 skyscrappers on 9/11 were destroyed still endures

See and hear the evidence, and then ask yourself - is another investigation warranted?

You will hear many (on the spot) witnesses report 'explosions'. It should be remembered, most of these 'explosions' they refer to happened BEFORE the buildings actually collapsed - down in the lobby at the very base of the building, a few seconds BEFORE the first plane hits. They also refer to explosions going down the sides of the buildings which were of course the actual demolition charges bringing the buildings down. One can see quite clearly see in the footage of the towers’ destruction, explosions coming down the sides of the buildings in a synchronised fashion.

According to NIST (the institution tasked with coming up with the explanation for how the buildings collapsed), said all three towers collapsed due to fire - fire that was caused by the jet fuel from the planes that were flown into them. The jet fuel went up in a ball flames on impact. It would not cause the entire structure to collapse in less than an hour. Building 7 wasn’t even hit by a plane - that collapsed due to office fires too - according to NIST).

This explanation is so patently absurd that it defies belief. Fires have never brought down steel framed high-rises anywhere in the world - ever, and there have been many. However, fire supposedly brought down 3 in one day on 9/11 - at free-fall speed. One has to be wilfully gullible to believe such a preposterous explanation.

The reason fires cannot bring down steel-framed high rises is because they are made of concrete and steel. Open fires do not burn hot enough to melt or incinerate either of those materials. That’s why the grate in your fireplace, or wood burning stove doesn’t melt. Much much higher temperatures are required for that - like a blast furnace.

Even if some of the structure was compromised by the damage caused by the plane impacts, it wouldn't bring the towers down at free fall speed to dust. The towers were purposely designed to withstand airliner impacts, naturally, since they were so high and near an international airport. The chief architect said that himself. In fact he said the towers could withstand multiple collisions. Interestingly a B25 bomber collided with The Empire State Building back in the 1940s - buried itself right in the side of it just like those of 9/11 - the building was not compromised and still stands to this day, as we well know.

This short montage of clips from the day illustrates the news as it was coming hot from the location - which is always the best news - the most honest news - as it hasn't had time to be messed with and altered in the studios and the false narrative added. Hundreds of eye and ear witnesses, as well as the news reporters speak of 'EXPLOSIONS'. In fact that's all they were concerned about after the initial plane impacts was further explosive devices. The fire service and police were all reporting explosions and the fear that more would happen. We can even hear the explosions ourselves in these clips. This is irrefutable evidence. The most likely cause of those collapses was due to explosives.

So why wouldn't NIST look into the possibility explosives were involved. To this day 'the establishment' refuse to entertain it. The evidence is so abundant and overwhelming one can only conclude this is a massive cover-up, therefore making this a crime of unimaginable proportion. I strongly suggest anyone interested in this topic search OPERATION NORTHWOODS.

Exerpts of this video came from AE911Truth.org an organisation dedicated to uncovering the truth about 9/11 and one which I wholly recommend.