Premium Only Content
 
			'Why I Write' (1946) by George Orwell
'Why I Write' (1946) is an essay by George Orwell detailing his personal journey to becoming a writer. It was first published in the Summer 1946 edition of Gangrel. The editors of this magazine, J.B.Pick and Charles Neil, had asked a selection of writers to explain why they write.
The essay offers a type of mini-autobiography in which he writes of having first completed poems and tried his hand at short-stories, and carried on a continuous "story" about himself in his head, before finally becoming a full-fledged writer. It goes on to set out some important motives for writing.
Orwell lists "four great motives for writing" which he feels exist in every writer. He explains that all are present, but in different proportions, and also that these proportions vary from time to time. They are as follows:
1. Sheer egoism- Orwell argues that a writer writes from a "desire to seem clever, to be talked about, to be remembered after death, to get your own back on grown-ups who snubbed you in childhood, etc." He says that this is a motive the writer shares with scientists, artists, lawyers - "the whole top crust of humanity" - and that the great mass of humanity, not acutely selfish, after the age of about thirty abandons individual ambition. A minority remains however, determined 'to live their own lives to the end, and writers belong in this class.' Serious writers are vainer than journalists, though "less interested in money".
2. Aesthetic enthusiasm- Orwell explains that the present in writing is the desire to make one's writing look and sound good, having "pleasure in the impact of one sound on another, in the firmness of good prose or the rhythm of a good story." He says that this motive is "very feeble in a lot of writers" but still present in all works of writing.
3. Historical impulse- He sums this up stating this motive is the "desire to see things as they are, to find out true facts and store them up for the use of posterity."
4. Political purpose- Orwell writes that "no book is genuinely free from political bias", and further explains that this motive is used very commonly in all forms of writing in the broadest sense, citing a "desire to push the world in a certain direction" in every person. He concludes by saying that "the opinion that art should have nothing to do with politics is itself a political attitude."
- 	
				 LIVE LIVELara Logan10 hours agoSHOTS FIRED: The Tyranny of Big Pharma Exposed with Dr. Sherri Tenpenny | EP 42 | Lara Logan774 watching
- 	
				 25:29 25:29Stephen Gardner1 hour ago💣 Trump White House UNEXPECTED Move + Thune DESTROYS Schumer on Senate Floor!!5.2K5
- 	
				 1:01:45 1:01:45Playback Request Live1 hour agoPRL LIVE @ DREAMHACK!!10.3K1
- 	
				 LIVE LIVEDr Disrespect5 hours ago🔴LIVE - DR DISRESPECT - ARC RAIDERS - DANGEROUS ADVENTURES (LEVEL 12)1,446 watching
- 	
				 14:15 14:15Tactical Advisor5 days agoEverything You Need To Know About PSA Mixtape Vol 1. (FIRST LOOK)2.82K2
- 	
				 LIVE LIVEJeff Ahern1 hour agoFriday Freak out with Jeff Ahern113 watching
- 	
				 14:54 14:54The Kevin Trudeau Show Limitless2 days agoThe Hidden Force Running Your Life54.4K8
- 	
				 1:03:55 1:03:55Sean Unpaved3 hours agoRavens' Resurrection Night: Lamar Buries Miami, NFL/CFB Spooky HC Shifts, & Kalshi's Week 9/10 Odds!26.5K
- 	
				 2:16:48 2:16:48Film Threat1 day agoHALLOWEEN HORROR + BACK TO THE FUTURE RERELEASE + MORE REVIEWS | Film Threat Livecast7.99K
- 	
				 1:21:16 1:21:16Steven Crowder6 hours ago10th Annual Halloween Spooktacular: Reacting to the 69 Gayest Horror Movies of All Time258K164