Four Tenets to Know and Defeat the Globalists

James talks about making sense of the enemy's actions and being part of their defeat.

Here is a link to the National Policy Consensus Center (NPCC): https://www.pdx.edu/policy-consensus-center/

Here is James' example of a Lawful Notice:

The following submission provides notice regarding pertinent information that absolutely has to be considered by Coos Bay City Officials Allowing a ‘consensus based process’ to stand in place of legitimate public input is a violation, and is fundamentally in contradiction of the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution of the State of Oregon . It is an affront to actual involvement of the Body Politic. These consensus based process’ are an unlawful intrusion to our Constitutional decision making process, they are considered to be an adjunct. I will first refer to ORS 192.620 policy: The Oregon form of government requires an informed public aware of deliberations and decisions of governing bodies and the information upon which such decisions were made. It is the intent of ORS 192.610 to 192.690 that decisions of governing bodies be arrived at openly. [1973 c 172 1]. Official replies and responses that “ concerns will be part of the record” are deceptive and a clear violation of the protections granted all citizens by the Constitution of the United States as well as the Constitution of the State of Oregon.

The lack of Public Notice and involvement, leads to a strong public perception of an appearance of impropriety. The following passage from the beginning of ORS 183.502 explains the actual illegal usage of any “Consensus Process” to make war on The People by attacking Constitutionally protected, granted rights. ORS 183.502; Authority of agencies to use alternative means of dispute resolution , model rules, amendment of agreements and forms; agency alternative dispute resolution programs. (1) Unless otherwise prohibited by law. The Oregon Administrative Procedures Act Section 183.400 (4) (a) specifically addresses the invalidity of any rule invalid only if it finds that the rule ; (a) Violates Constitutional provisions”

The law mandates a Public Input Process that is well defined though willfully ignored by the the Policy Consensus Practitioners. Instead a falsified public input process has been substituted to create a false history of public acceptance. Involvement by “stakeholders” and numerous NGO organizations that are financially supported by organizations both inside and outside of our State is an unrealistic intrusion by a few overreaching into the lives of the entire population threatening granted rights that is in direct conflict of both Federal and State law.

It can only be concluded that the entire process that has been used, constitutes a broad based scheme of artifice that does not give the actual consent of or allow the ability of “the people” of the State of Oregon, Coos County in particular in this instance to give legitimate public input. Any Consensus based Public Input Process involvement by third party beneficiaries or “ Stakeholders” and documented as “Consent” to proceed is hereby rejected. The falsified historical record of NGO organizations funded by national groups and wealthy individuals that provide undue influence upon the Public Input Process is also rejected as no true public consent has been given nor sought. This plan in it's conception and further implementation constitute an unlawful infringement and harm besides having no lawful authority to proceed.