Great Barrier Reef definition changed to impose harsh regulations on Aussie farmers

“If a man can become a woman, why can't a freshwater swamp transition into a coral reef - just by a scientist saying so?

This is a lighthearted look at some highly dubious 'science' where supposed damage to the Great Barrier Reef requires scientists to define freshwater systems as integral parts of the GBR. If they did not do this, they would have proven, quite correctly, that farmers are not affecting the GBR at all.

We also look at a genuine environmental problem - that of feral animals and noxious weeds on the land - there are no feral animals or noxious weeds on the reef.”

•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

Excellent clip by Peter Ridd on the @Reef Rebels page.

Peter explains how the bureaucracy has changed the definition of the Great Barrier Reef to justify imposing harsh regulations on our farmers.

It’s just another example of how your Government is trying to destroy our productive industries.

peoplefirstparty.au

Original Source: Senator Gerard Rennick