Media and Public Fear: Who Benefits?

Starting October 8, a wave of media publications began circulating in Slovakia and the Czech Republic, creating a negative perception of the ALLATRA International Public Movement. These publications emerged shortly after a Czech journalist, known for publishing critical articles about various groups, was summoned for a preliminary hearing.

Two weeks following the hearing, numerous articles criticizing the ALLATRA Movement appeared simultaneously in the media. Over just nine days, more than 140 articles were published in Slovak outlets, indicating the scale of this media campaign. In these publications, the name "ALLATRA" is often mentioned in the context of a potential threat, potentially fostering fear and anxiety in society. This media activity also appears aimed at influencing the Slovak General Prosecutor’s Office's future actions.

The situation soon took on a political tone, with certain opposition figures using it in statements against citizens' democratic rights. As a result of this pressure, the prosecutor's decision was revised.

Do we consider that such actions may have serious consequences for democratic principles in the future? Why is only one perspective, backed by resources and media access, prevailing in this situation? Whose interests are at play, and why does this concern each of us?