Weapons Embargo & Dismantling harmful religious narratives - video 66

In this video I say less and write more. Read first. Thank you. I point out - and I say so at the end of the video - that not Christianity or Islam should be dismantled but only the narratives that have caused hatred, violence, terror etc. 
Many might be pissed off now but my aim is to find out what our problems have been and how to get out if it, so that we all can somehow live together without violence.
By the way, Flavius Josephus (37/38-100) was born after the narrative of Jesus and is not seen as a reliable historian. Historical texts are in science descriptions of what happened by contemporaries (in this case Roman and Jewish texts of this time and area, but they don't exist) and even these have to be proven and confirmed by other sources (because propaganda is as old as humanity). Historical texts are not the same as just "old texts". I forgot to say that the gospels were written around 100 years after the proclaimed life of Jesus - in Greek, in Greece (the most taken from stories about Eliyahu and Elisha, and some general Talmudic ethics). They are religious texts, not historical texts.

What I tried to point out is: Christianity has tried to eradicate Jews &Judaism BECAUSE they claim that Jesus was Jewish and that they are rooted in Judaism. Islam has tried the same also - for a big part- because they claim to be an Abrahamic religion and just have the last prophet (Bahai also say that but at least they are harmless). Augustinus wrote that Jews are the slaves of the church and one can do with them whatever one wants, except killing them! Really a religion of love..
This Islamic " last prophet " claim is so dangerous and violent because it justifies for them both forced conversion of others and the murder of others (mainly Jews), like the Christian "Jewish Messiah" claim justified the forced conversion of others and the murder of others (mainly Jews). And both claim that Israel is their land which can't be proven in history by any means. And both have imposed themselves on others - mainly Jews.
The result we see in history & nowadays politics.

The opposite would be:
-Christianity could say they believe in a Jesus as their messiah, nothing more, don't connect it with Judaism and just be happy with what they have. Don't bother others.
- Islam could say Mohammed was their - and only their - prophet, don't connect it with Judaism, Christianity and others, don't bother others and just be happy with what they have.
The world would have looked quite nice, right?
The Celts never claimed that their gods were the gods of the Romans, Jews don't claim that their prophets are the prophets of other people (honestly, we're quite annoyed about the occupation of our bible, prophets etc by others), Hindus don't say that their gods are your gods and Buddhists don't claim that their believes must be your believes.
It's actually quite simple.

By they way, many think that in the 2 Babylonian exiles the whole population of Juda was expelled. No. That was only the aristocracy (royal family & priests) - the ones who could have organise revolts -, not the general population.

Rawaf alSaeen on some facts https://rumble.com/v3sj189-what-saudi-author-and-media-personality-rawaf-al-saeen-thinks-of-palestinia.html

A bit on Flavius Josephus who is used by Christians as a "proof" for the existence of Jesus https://www.britannica.com/biography/Flavius-Josephus

A woman wrote to me in X on my hint that religious narratives shouldn't be mixed up with facts: "But that he existed is proven historically. Without his body we can't prove it scientifically." - this is called ideology. I mean, what? By the way, this ascending to heaven is stolen from a story about the prophet Eliyahu (and there it is not meant literally).