DeepState Panic: Tulsi Gabbard’s DNI Nomination Exposes the System

Washington, DC, November 17, 2024 -- Former Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard’s nomination as Director of National Intelligence (DNI) by President-elect Donald Trump has reignited unsubstantiated accusations from media outlets and political opponents, branding her a "Russian asset" and criticizing her 2017 meeting with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. However, a deeper examination of her record, historical precedent, and her targeting by the Biden administration reveals a troubling double standard and misuse of power.

Unfounded Accusations and Legal Precedent
Tulsi Gabbard’s 2017 meeting with Assad, while controversial, was part of a fact-finding mission aimed at exploring solutions to the Syrian civil war. As a sitting member of Congress, her actions were legal and well within her authority. Despite vocal criticism, she was never charged with any crimes and has already been confirmed by Congress for high-level roles in the past, demonstrating her credibility and commitment to service.

Targeted by the Biden Administration
Gabbard has been outspoken in her criticism of President Joe Biden’s policies, particularly on issues of censorship, foreign policy, and the weaponization of federal agencies. Following her public dissent, Gabbard revealed in 2023 that she was approached by federal air marshals who admitted they had been assigned to surveil her. According to the air marshals, this type of targeting was “happening a lot to Republicans.” Such actions have raised serious concerns about the Biden administration's use of government resources to monitor political opponents.

A History of Diplomatic Engagement
Critics of Gabbard’s meeting with Assad overlook the long-standing precedent of U.S. leaders engaging with controversial figures, often as part of broader diplomatic efforts:

Barack Obama: Held multiple meetings with Russian President Vladimir Putin, even as accusations of war crimes in Ukraine and Syria mounted.
Hillary Clinton: Met with Putin during her tenure as Secretary of State as part of the Obama administration’s “reset” policy with Russia.
Condoleezza Rice and John McCain: Both met with Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi in separate attempts to normalize relations or discuss military cooperation.
Donald Trump: As president, Trump engaged directly with North Korea’s Kim Jong-un, an unprecedented diplomatic move despite Kim’s record of human rights abuses.
Domestic Leaders Accused of War Crimes
It’s worth noting that accusations of war crimes have also been directed at U.S. leaders, often by their political opponents:

Barack Obama: Some Democrats criticized Obama’s use of drone strikes in civilian areas, calling them violations of international law.
George W. Bush: Republicans, along with international critics, accused Bush of war crimes related to the Iraq War and torture practices under his administration.
These accusations underline how politically charged such terms can be and the importance of separating rhetoric from reality.

The "DeepState" Narrative
Gabbard’s experience with political targeting has amplified concerns about the influence of what many refer to as the "DeepState" — unelected bureaucrats and intelligence operatives allegedly acting in ways that undermine democracy. Her nomination challenges this entrenched power structure and serves as a litmus test for government accountability.

Tulsi Gabbard’s history of military service, bipartisan cooperation, and willingness to challenge entrenched power structures make her uniquely qualified for the role of DNI. The criticism she faces reflects more about the fear of systemic reform than her ability to lead.

♡⋆｡˚❁˚｡⋆♡⋆｡˚❁˚｡⋆♡⋆｡˚❁˚｡⋆♡

It’s not about the Left or the Right, but what is Right and what is WRONG! 🚨 — ❄️ Chill Out at 👉 TrumpRap.com 👈 for Original DJ 'T' Tracks that Drop Like 💣 A-BOMB!

♡⋆｡˚❁˚｡⋆♡⋆｡