Hey Delaware, "No Judge is Above the Law."

Kangaroos jumping all over Our Constitution.
See United States District Court Case 1:24-cv-00792-JLH Pritchard v. Williams et al filed 7/8/2024.

See how they hide US District Judge Gregory B. Williams.
Also, see the filings and how things are hidden by complicit clerks altering filing titles.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

NOVEMBER 12, 2024

CASE 1:24-CV-00792-JLH

[Sui Juris Petitioner, Andrew Hamilton Pritchard]
Vs.
[In their individual capacity, Judge, Gregory B. Williams, et al],

NOVEMBER 12, 2024
PUBLIC NOTICE
CGS 54-170 ARREST WITHOUT WARRANT

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF DELAWARE AND THE STATE OF DELAWARE HAVE NO AUTHORITY TO ADJUDICATE AS THEY ARE “AT WAR WITH THE U.S. CONSTITUTION” AND “ENGAGES IN ACTS OF TREASON”. THE COMPLICIT COURT IS AN “ENEMY” OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ENGAGED IN “DOMESTIC TERRORISM”, “RACKETEERING”, “TREASON” AND MORE.

The Constitution is harmed by subverting its authority as the foundational law of the land. A domestic enemy is any American who either promotes foreign invasion or attacks the Bill of Rights. The former assaults national stability. The latter assaults individual freedoms.

As a living-breathing American Man, one of “We the People”, the Fourth Branch of Our Government, I, Andrew Hamilton Pritchard, have authority to address any felony that I witness firsthand.

Supreme Court Case Law:

Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S. Ct. 1401 (1958)

Note: Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States wars against that Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the supreme law of the land. The judge is engaged in acts of treason. The U.S. Supreme Court has stated that "no state legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it". See also In Re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (188); U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S. Ct. 471, 66 L. Ed. 2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L. Ed 257 (1821).

Axon Enterprise, Inc. v. FTC, 143 S. Ct. 890 (2023) Nos. 21-86 and 21-1239 (April 14, 2023),

"Cases involving ... deprivations or transfers of life, liberty, or property constitute a core of cases that ... MUST be resolved by Article III courts—not executive adjudicators dressed up as courts".

Boyd v. United, 116 U.S. 616 at 635 (1885)

Justice Bradley, "It may be that it is the obnoxious thing in its mildest form; but illegitimate and unconstitutional practices get their first footing in that way; namely, by silent approaches and slight deviations from legal modes of procedure. This can only be obviated by adhering to the rule that constitutional provisions for the security of persons and property should be liberally construed. A close and literal construction deprives them of half their efficacy, and leads to gradual depreciation of the right, as if it consisted more in sound than in substance. It is the duty of the Courts to be watchful for the Constitutional Rights of the Citizens, and against any stealthy encroachments thereon. Their motto should be Obsta Principiis."

LIBERTY:
In Meyer v. State of Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390 (1923),

“While this court has not attempted to define with exactness the liberty thus guaranteed, the term has received much consideration and some of the included things have been definitely stated. Without doubt, it denotes not merely freedom from bodily restraint but also the right of the individual to contract, to engage in any of the common occupations of life, to acquire useful knowledge, to marry, establish a home and bring up children, to worship God according to the dictates of his own conscience, and generally to enjoy those privileges long recognized at common law as essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free men.”

The obvious and most basic violations of Human and Constitutional Rights result in extraordinary irreparable harm to so many.