AJ Rumours - News from our Crazy Corner of YouTube...

The Irony of Jahfar Blackman’s Comment on AJ Lashbrook and the Claims by Bleeding Heart.
Jahfar Blackman’s recent comment regarding the claims surrounding AJ Lashbrook raises questions that are both ironic and thought-provoking. In response to the allegations by YouTuber Bleeding Heart that AJ Lashbrook's father is a convicted paedophile, Blackman passionately defends AJ, condemning Matthew Taylor’s investigations into the matter.
Here’s Blackman’s comment:
“Matt I think you're taking the piss if you think it's AJ. Do your due diligence research, because the rumours you have been highlighting about AJ are dangerous. Just because the Nonce has the same surname as AJ, don’t mean it’s any relation. I went to school with people who had the same surname as me, and I was not related to them. Like I said to you earlier, this is nasty work Matt. Revenge is one thing, but this is evil.”
What makes this comment deeply ironic is AJ Lashbrook’s own chosen online persona and the narrative he propagates. AJ Lashbrook uses the username “Lucifer,” a name universally synonymous with evil. Through his content, AJ consistently shares his belief that there is no God and that evil operates unchecked and unpunished.
The name “Lucifer” carries symbolic weight. By adopting it as a moniker, AJ implicitly aligns himself with the very concept of malevolence. Yet, when rumours about his father’s criminal past emerge—rumours tied to the name Andrew Lashbrook, who lives in the same area as AJ—the irony is undeniable. Blackman and AJ’s supporters decry the spread of such information as “evil,” but AJ has willingly embraced a persona built around that very concept.
Unanswered Questions and the Role of Secrecy.
To complicate matters, research shows that Andrew Lashbrook married Joy Crafer in 1985 and AJ Lashbrook was born in 1988—a time frame that fits the possibility of a familial relationship. AJ’s steadfast refusal to address these allegations or clarify his family background adds fuel to the fire.
When people maintain high levels of secrecy about their personal lives, they inevitably invite speculation. The easiest way for AJ to put these rumours to rest would have been transparency: publicly stating who his father is and decisively quashing the claim that it’s Andrew Lashbrook. Instead, silence has allowed these rumours to grow.
The Duality of “Lucifer.”
The most striking irony lies in AJ Lashbrook’s continued use of the “Lucifer” persona. While his supporters label Matthew Taylor’s investigation into these claims as “evil,” they fail to reconcile this accusation with AJ’s own self-assigned identity.
There’s an old adage: “Live by the sword, die by the sword.” In AJ’s case, it seems fitting to modify it: “Be evil, and evil will be done to you.” If AJ is willing to align himself with the notion of unchecked malevolence, then he can hardly claim injustice when he becomes the subject of rumours and investigations.
Ultimately, this situation serves as a cautionary tale about the power of perception. By choosing a name like “Lucifer” and openly rejecting concepts of good and evil, AJ Lashbrook has painted himself into a corner. If he wishes to dispel these rumours, the solution is clear: transparency and accountability. Until then, the irony of his supporters’ indignation will continue to undermine their arguments.

Read more - https://theworldaccordingt26.wixsite.com/exposing-aj-lashbroo