DNA Contamination in mRNA Vaccines Exposes Shocking Regulatory Failures and Public Health Risks Dr. Kevin McKernan: "We'll be discussing the DNA contamination that we have found inside the mRNA vaccines and what implications that may have for the quality of the vaccines and any sort of clinical side effects that they may present." "What are you finding in your research on the vaccines? The DNA contamination is actually quite varied lot to lot. We have seen some that have CT scores, which is a PCR score people may be familiar with from COVID testing, that are as low as 1213. COVID testing, you might have been deemed positive at 35, which is a a a million fold less RNA than what we're finding in the shots as as a contaminant that's injected." "We're also finding that there are, fragments of DNA in there that are active inside mammalian cells. Very recently, we have we have transfected these things into mammalian cells, and we can see some evidence that the DNA is getting replicated in the cell." "So that's a big deal because in the past, we thought, well, maybe the DNA will get destroyed as it goes into the cell. What we're seeing now is there's evidence that actually it's it's growing in number when it gets into the cell for brief periods of time, and it is surviving several passages of cells. So we take cells and transfect them with the vaccines." "This is work that Uli's done over in Germany. The cells express spike protein. We can see that with immunohistochemistry. You then take a portion of those cells and regrow them in another flask for, like, another 3 to 6 days and, and measure again, and we can see RNA and DNA from the vaccines still in there." "We're told several things. We were told, it wouldn't last long. We were told this DNA contamination wouldn't get into the cells. That's wrong. We were told if it did get into the cells, it would disappear and never get into the nucleus. Now we're finding all of those things were wrong." "Now we're beginning to look at whether it's getting into the nucleus right now, by looking for DNA integration. We have some very preliminary evidence that needs to be verified with longer reads, but we can find pieces of DNA from the spike sequence in the vaccine that is fused with chromosome 12 and chromosome 9." "What we don't know is whether it is actually in the chromosome or whether this is some type of extra chromosomal thing going on. And that we did this all with cancer cell lines, and the problem with cancer cell lines is they go through a process known as chromofripsis, which is like the genome shatters a little bit. Some pieces of DNA don't get carried on to the next generation." "And it so we we don't know whether our DNA is integrated to the actual chromosome or whether it is something that's an extra chromosomal mess that might get eliminated. So we need longer reads to sort that out. But it's very concerning in that this was found, the fur really the first time we looked, which didn't so it didn't take a whole lot of effort to do this. The, our collaborator sent us cells." "We we looked at them with qPCR throughout passaging, found some that were still positive after the second passage and sequenced, and then bang, there was, first time we looked, we found 2 integration events." "It is astonishing that, we don't have this type of surveillance given how cheap DNA sequencing is now. I mean, there are sequencers now on space stations. They're so cheap and portable, that it it it's mind blowing that this isn't getting done on every single lot. You get alone. It didn't get done at all." "And the genotoxicity studies were weren't done because they claimed it's pure mRNA. Now that's that's really concerning because if you go through Moderna's own patents, you can find that they knew about this. They knew that DNA was an oncogenic risk through insertional mutagenesis, and they worked hard to invent new techniques to try and get rid of this." "And then they do have less DNA than Pfizer. So when you start seeing that the the companies have patents that speak to these problems, yet the regulators won't read those patents to know and they'll deny that these things are a problem." "There's a massive disconnect going. So we didn't find the whole virus. The whole virus is about 5,000 bases long. We did find, the s v 40 origin of replication, which is important. I'll touch on that." The sv40 promoter, and the sv40 enhancer and one other piece of it, the the, part of the poly a signal, those four pieces. But the sv40 enhancer has been published by David Dean to be a nuclear targeting sequence." "So all the people who are claiming this will never get the nucleus aren't really aware that, no, there's the sequence in this plasma drives it straight there. The other piece of information there is the s p 40 origin of replication. That's a mammalian origin of replication." "What that means is when that gets into a mammalian cell, it starts making more of itself. So that's I think that's a very important risk that the regulators need to consider. They have these regulations speaking to nanograms of DNA, and they treat all DNA as equal." "And you can't do that because some DNA can amplify when it gets inside of a cell. Therefore, the limit that you could allow should be arguably lower for anything that can self amplify. The the the regulations are too blind to this. Now that we have sequencing tools that we have today, that we shouldn't have this any any any DNA is fine." "Like, we have the capacity to read exactly everything that's in there, and we should be a hell of a more intelligent about what we allow in the in the vaccines. Independent of our findings, I think we need changes of the policy. But in terms of what we have found, I think we have to be screening vaccinated biopsies, cancer biopsies, perhaps blood banks." "Like, there is concern over, okay, we we now have the the blood supply contaminated with this. There's quantitative PCR we could be using for screening that. There's there's lactating mothers that are concerned that this is in the breast milk shortly after, after vaccination. We had a paper out last week that showed it was in the placenta. So all types of questions are showing up now." "The crossing paper showed it in heart tissue. So it's by the biodistribution of these LNPs are everywhere, and it's bringing with it all of this payload, that isn't being well monitored, yet we have we've never been in a better position to be able to sequence all the RNA and DNA in a vaccine if we're gonna use these platforms." "So, I think they do need to have far better, transparency on the on the QC. And then what you'll see today in this in this meeting is independent of the DNA contamination issues. There is a host of other problems with these vaccines that they should be pulled through the market immediately just over those alone." "I think the I think the DNA contamination is more of a signature a forensic signature of absolute incompetence that's going on in the regulatory system, and and that just shows itself because it's a very traceable molecule." Source: https://x.com/newstart_2024/status/1873483785016058171?s=46