Moore vs Alliance Credit

The case **Alliant Credit Union v. Moore, Zachary T. et al.** (Case No. 2024cv030075) involves a legal dispute between Alliant Credit Union and Zachary T. Moore, among other defendants. Here's an analysis based on available information:

### **Case Overview:**
- **Filing Date:** The case was filed in 2024.
- **Jurisdiction:** This case appears in state court records, specifically within the context of California's legal system, given the reference to "http://trellis.law," a platform that provides access to state trial court data.

### **Nature of the Case:**
- **Type:** The case is primarily categorized as a **Foreclosure** action. This indicates that Alliant Credit Union is likely attempting to recover property or enforce a lien due to alleged default on a mortgage or similar financial obligation by Zachary T. Moore and potentially other defendants.

### **Key Points from Related Information:**
- **Supreme Court Ruling:** There's mention of a Supreme Court decision in a related or similar case, "Zachary Moore v. Alliant Credit Union et al.," decided on January 14, 2025, where Justice Alito delivered the opinion. This ruling found that foreclosure proceedings against Zachary Moore by Alliant Credit Union were unconstitutional, primarily because the mortgage was based on fiat currency, raising issues under the Fifth, Thirteenth, and Fourteenth Amendments. This ruling suggests that the current case might be influenced or even potentially voided by this higher court's decision if it pertains directly to Moore's situation or similar legal principles.[](https://thinkingwithzach.blogspot.com/2025/01/zachary-moore-v-alliant-credit-union-et.html)[](https://case-law.vlex.com/vid/page-v-alliant-credit-891965447)[](https://trellis.law)

### **Implications:**
- **Legal Precedent:** The Supreme Court ruling would serve as a significant legal precedent affecting similar cases, potentially impacting the outcome of this foreclosure action by questioning the validity of mortgage contracts based on fiat currency or the legality of foreclosure practices under constitutional scrutiny.

- **Current Status:** Given the Supreme Court's ruling in January 2025, the status of this case might be in limbo, pending further legal actions or appeals based on the new constitutional interpretation.

- **Broader Impact:** This case might be part of a larger discussion or movement questioning the traditional banking and mortgage practices, especially in light of constitutional rights and the nature of currency in legal contracts.

### **Conclusion:**
The case "Alliant Credit Union v. Moore, Zachary T. et al." appears to be directly affected by a landmark Supreme Court decision, which could potentially alter or nullify the proceedings based on the constitutional arguments presented. This situation underscores significant legal debates about the nature of money, contracts, and property rights under U.S. law. However, without direct access to the case details or recent updates, the exact status, such as whether this case has been dismissed, appealed, or settled, remains unclear.