Well, the basic [Drosten] test was that three different genes of that Sars-CoV-2 virus would be tested for, which they eventually reduced, I think, to one gene piece. But we looked at all these three fragments, in this test, and we also optimized it. We optimized those primers with which you can produce those bands. But additionally, we used two of the same segments that others have used, but we also selected another segment, which could possibly generate a better signal. No, we actually used the original test, which consisted of three pieces. And in addition, we looked at three pieces of our own choice, two of which were from the Corman-Drosten story and one new segment, to see if that would improve the test. Yes, so the new segment you selected yourself.., so you basically made your own test design, that's where the new segment stems from. -Yes, correct. -What we found was, that there were problems with that test. There are still isues with ourown test, as Well. In particular, what we found is that, after sequencing, we could detect the virus in some of those patents. But, as Peter also pointed out, some of those pieces, the one called the N gene in particular, which Peter thought might also produce clear hits with the human genome -which is indeed what we found. What that actually means is that with one of those fragments, you may possibly pick up on human DNA. One of those fragments from the Corman-Drosten paper... -And that is a false positive. ....simply gets triggered by my own DNA? -That could be, yes. "There are problems with the Corona PCR test". The research paper that Rogier Louwen told about in Potkaars has now - despite all the resistance - been published as a working paper https://zenodo.org/record/7492630#.Y7QH8xXMKUl presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QE8HW7TXjdw

Kary Mullis, Ph.D biochemist and Nobel Prize winner for PCR - discovery, DIED a few weeks before the scam of the century "pandemic"

Kary Mullis, Nobel in chemistry, who invented the PCR test, talks in a 1990s interview about AIDS & the PCR test in GENERAL TERMS & how PCR test results can be misinterpreted! He died August 2019 just prior to CV being released! Coincidence? #RESIST

Kary Mullis Invented PCR & Won A Nobel Prize For It He Once Stated PCR Was Not Designed To Diagnose An Infectious Disease Listen To What He Has To Say About Fauci Sadly Mullis Passed Away Right Before The 'Outbreak' I Wonder What He Would Have To Say If He Were Around Today?

Follow the science? Dr. Kary Mullis—Nobel Prize-winning biochemist and the brilliant mind behind the invention of the PCR test.

Kary B. Mullis died in 2019 of pneumonia after saying the PCR were not a accurate diagnosis test but a tool to use

Kary B. Mullis Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1993 Born: 28 December 1944, Lenoir, NC, USA Died: 7 August 2019, Newport Beach, CA, USA Prize motivation: “for his invention of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method” Prize share: 1/2

Dr. Kary Mullis would turn over in his grave if he knew how they abused the PCR test during COVID. H/T @DrLoupis

A brilliant scientist and inventor, Kary Mullis, conveniently died just before the outbreak of the Covid 19 HOAX. His PCR duplication / amplification process (intended as a research tool only), earned him the Nobel Prize in Chemistry. PCR was again recently misused to wrongly diagnose Covid and boost the fear. Mullis warned us about this misuse of his PCR, and about Anthony Fauci while he was alive. * Become an educational activist by supporting the production and advertisement of our videos: https://www.realhistorychan.com/donate.html By Mail: PASCAL PUBLICATIONS, P.O. Box 804, Saddle Brook, NJ 07663 FREE Report! (see footer at RHC website) *How to Respond to Anti-Conspiracy Theorists

Dr. Scott Jensen tells Jordan Peterson that the CDC artificially inflated COVID death numbers. @drscottjensen @jordanbpeterson

Dr Robert E Willner....Does the press bother reading? Do the understand the English language? PCR Test, virologist, culture, antibodies,

"There was no pandemic." Neil Oliver: "What we ended up with was a pandemic of testing, with the misapplication of PCR tests that were never designed, according to their designer, to be used as diagnostic tools." "They simply took an opportunity to do something that they were planning to do anyway, which was to use a pandemic to seize control of people's freedom, and their money—the biggest transfer of wealth in history." "If we had a pandemic of anything, it was a pandemic of propaganda, a pandemic of lies and a pandemic of testing." Do you agree or disagree with Neil Oliver? Credit: @thecoastguy @TuckerCarlson Source: https://x.com/wideawake_media/status/1877344284166197700

"What we ended up with was a pandemic of testing, with the misapplication of PCR tests that were never designed, according to their designer, to be used as diagnostic tools." "They simply took an opportunity to do something that they were planning to do anyway, which was to use a pandemic to seize control of people's freedom, and their money—the biggest transfer of wealth in history." "If we had a pandemic of anything, it was a pandemic of propaganda, a pandemic of lies and a pandemic of testing." Credit: @thecoastguy @TuckerCarlson Source: https://x.com/wideawake_media/status/1820074902231101739?s=46

“Ohio Poison Control Centres are sounding the alarm, surrounding a liquid substance known as as Sodium Azide found in Home Covid Testing kits” Just another one the Conspiracy Theorists called correctly - PCR testing is not good for anyone.

🚨🚨The PCR test created an illusion of a pandemic, do you know why? They ran the amplification cycle at 37-45x and that produced false positive test at a rate of 90% + It was all a fraud 🤷‍♂️

Dr. Simon Goddek on Christian Drosten's Conflicts of Interest & How the PCR Test Fueled the Pandemic "If you want to create a pandemic...you create a PCR protocol, you put the CT [cycle threshold] between 35-45 and you test healthy people...that's how you create cases and that's what they did" @drdrew @goddeketal

#5 In July 2020, Dr. Anthony Fauci admitted that PCR tests set at 35 cycles or higher produced mostly false positives or "dead nucleotides." So why was the entire country using PCR tests set at 35 cycles or higher?

#7 In Sept. 2020, CNN's Andrew Cuomo reported that PCR tests were "too sensitive." "In three sets of testing data that include cycle thresholds, compiled by officials in Massachusetts, New York, and Nevada, up to 90% of people testing positive carried barely any virus..."

🚨Using PCR to justify mass culling of asymptomatic chickens in ‘avian flu outbreaks’ is like sentencing an entire town to exile because a few dust particles tested positive for smoke. Detecting viral fragments (often indistinguishable from nucleic acids from damaged cells) is not the same as confirming infection, let alone infectiousness—yet entire poultry industries are dismantled based on a molecular whisper, not a biological reality. Even Kary Mullis, the inventor of PCR, warned that it should never be used as a diagnostic tool for infectious diseases.🐓 Just like they murdered people & children with their vaccines! You are murdering god’s creatures! This is beyond evil!👿

#10 In July 2021, Dr. Peter McCullough (@P_McCulloughMD) explained: #1 COVID doesn't spread asymptomatically. #2 Stop testing asymptomatic people. #3 Natural immunity is robust & durable. #4 COVID is easily treatable at home. #5 Vax is obsolete & unsafe for human use.

The CDC employed two distinct PCR diagnostic levels: for the general population, tests were conducted at 44 cycles, increasing the likelihood of false positives. In contrast, other groups were subjected to only 17 cycles, reducing the risk of false positives. This approach led to a substantial number of people being misdiagnosed with COVID-19. Dr. Natalie Bjorklund Gordon, a Geneticist and Epidemiologist with training in mRNA technology observed disparities between the government's messaging and her mRNA education. #NCI #Canada #cdnpoli #mRNA #COVID19 #CovidVaccines #NeitherSafeNorEffective #StoptheShots #TruthMatters

🚨🚨🚨The PCR test is responsible for the illusion of a pandemic👇 Dr. Laura Braden : “High cycles of PCR testing was causing a lot of FALSE POSITIVES - Those false positives were used to support the asymptomatic spread of #Covid” “PCR detects NUCLEIC ACID and NOT disease. NEVER before in my training have we showed an animal to be sick from PCR testing.” “A PCR test is NEVER used by itself to detect disease, you need to CONFIRM with a bacterial culture or a virus culture and that was NOT done during #Covid.” “It has been determined CONCLUSIVELY over and over again that high cycles of PCR testing over 30 can detect very minor levels of viral RNA and does NOT INDICATE INFECTIVITY.” “They used PCR cycles at RIDICULOUSLY high levels across Canadian 🇨🇦 provinces and routinely used 40-45 cycles, which is INCONSISTENT with the science based on the test.” #PCR #Vaccine

Dr. Fauci MUST GO TO PRISON. Dr. Fauci knows that the only things you need to ‘make a pandemic’ is a ‘PCR test’ (that can give you whatever results you choose) and a compromised MSM to induce fear amongst the population. Source: https://x.com/liz_churchill10/status/1856375356334174550