Future Multiverse Exposed: Lies, Fraud, Court Cases & Shady Deals of Dr. Farzam Kamalabadi Uncovered

Future Multiverse claims to be a groundbreaking platform integrating blockchain, NFTs, AI, and the metaverse, offering investors an opportunity to be part of a revolutionary digital economy. However, beneath its polished marketing lies a troubling reality of misleading claims, fabricated partnerships, and questionable business practices.

At the center of this operation is Dr. Farzam Kamalabadi, a man who presents himself as a global economic strategist but has a history riddled with financial disputes, unverified accomplishments, and connections to known fraudsters. This video exposes the serious concerns surrounding Future Multiverse and why anyone considering an investment should think twice.

The Red Flags of Future Multiverse
Future Multiverse presents itself as an all-encompassing ecosystem, yet its ambitious promises lack technical documentation or a functioning product.

No tangible product or technology – Despite claims of a fully developed blockchain and AI-powered economy, there is no evidence that these systems exist or operate as described.
Overpriced digital real estate – Selling virtual land at $50 per square meter and charging $365 per year in rental fees is unjustified and exploitative. Comparable platforms offer significantly lower prices with proven infrastructure.
Fabricated endorsements – Future Multiverse falsely claims that its "Future Trends Africa Manifesto" was adopted by the White House, yet there is no official record or evidence supporting this claim. Similarly, there are no verifiable endorsements from African governments.
Ties to known crypto scammers – Dr. Farzam Kamalabadi has documented associations with figures like Sam Lee and Shavez Anwar, both of whom have been linked to fraudulent blockchain schemes and Ponzi-like crypto projects.
Court cases and financial misconduct – In 2021, a Chinese court found Kamalabadi liable in a financial dispute involving 2 million RMB ($280,000 USD), ruling that he had no legal basis to withhold investor funds.
Aggressive legal threats against critics – Instead of addressing concerns with transparency, Future Multiverse’s so-called "Compliance Team" has resorted to intimidation tactics to silence those exposing the truth.
The Legal History of Dr. Farzam Kamalabadi
A court ruling in China exposed Kamalabadi’s deceptive business dealings. In 2014, he persuaded an investor, Jiang Jie, to transfer 2 million RMB under the promise of lucrative oil industry partnerships. No contract was ever signed, and no business was conducted. When the investor requested a refund, Kamalabadi refused to return the money, leading to legal action.

The court ruled that Kamalabadi had no legal basis to keep the funds and ordered him to repay the full amount with interest. He failed to appear in court, further demonstrating a pattern of avoiding accountability. This case raises serious concerns about his integrity, particularly as the head of a venture that demands significant financial investment from participants.

Why Future Multiverse is a High-Risk Venture
Future Multiverse exhibits the characteristics of past failed investment schemes, including:

Lack of proof for claimed technology or partnerships
Heavy reliance on speculative investment and pre-sales
Association with known crypto fraudsters and Ponzi operators
Overuse of buzzwords without technical substance
Misleading endorsements designed to create false credibility
Future Multiverse’s pricing structure, reliance on NFT sales, and claims of limitless potential mirror patterns seen in past crypto scams. The absence of transparency, combined with Kamalabadi’s history, should be enough to warrant extreme caution.

Final Warning
There is no verifiable evidence that Future Multiverse has a working product, real partnerships, or sustainable revenue models. Instead, it relies on misleading marketing, unsubstantiated claims, and expensive buy-ins to attract new participants.

If you are considering investing in Future Multiverse, take a step back and ask critical questions. Demand transparency, seek independent audits, and question any venture that refuses to provide verifiable proof of its claims.