New Testament Textual Analysis 16 - Mark 16:9-20 External Evidence

A description of some external evidence pertaining to Mark 16:9-20.

1:00 - Defining "original text"
3:45 - Misinformation about Mk 16:9-20 is widespread
4:40 - Vague and misleading Bible footnotes about Mk 16:9-20
5:30 - Vaticanus: its memorial space between Mk and Lk
7:30 - Sinaiticus' cancel sheet and its text's unusual format
13:00 - 1,650+ Greek manuscripts include Mk 16:9-20 including early MSS
14:00 - notes about Mk 16:9-20
15:00 - Metzger's misrepresentation of the notes
16:00 - Metzger's/Wallace's false "asterisks or obeli" claim
19:45 - Patristic evidence
Clement Origen Eusebius (Ad Marinum) Jerome (Ad Hedibiam, echoing Eusebius)
Justin Martyr Tatian (Diatessaron) Irenaeus (Against Heresies Book 3)
28:45 - More patristic references
Tertullian's allusions Hippolytus Apostolic Constitutions Didascalia Vincent of Thibaris
De Rebaptismate Old Latin Capitula (Cy form) Hierocles Aphrahat (Demonstration 1)
Acts of Pilate Freer Logion Fortunatianus
35:00 - Ambrose - church-reading in Milan Ephrem Epiphanius Augustine Leucian Acts
37:00 - Macarius Magnes Doctrine of Addai Pelagius Philostorgius Eznik of Golb
Prosper of Aquitaine Marcus Eremita Nestorius Peter Chrysologus Patrick
39:00 - Assorted Support for Mark 16:9-20 - abundant ancient and dIverse
40:00 - the Shorter Ending

#mark16 #jamessnappjr #authenticity #textualcriticism #freer #eusebius #augustine #saintpatrick