You hear of "cavemen", "hunter-gatherer", the "bronze and iron ages", etc. but how accurate are these terms and where do these really fit into a historically accurate timeline? We will look at who cavemen were and why they were. We will spend the first 10 minutes looking at how you can know what I am saying is accurate. You may find this helpful for you to evaluate the accuracy of information from the media. Then we will sort out some of the mixture of myth and truth surrounding cavemen. This will be based around a bigger picture of a timeline based on the oldest written records (including the Bible), archaeology, genetics, geology, and the Hebrew language. The timeline being used is probably accurate within about 150 years and generally within 50 years or less. Don Slinger has a B.S. in Wildlife Management from the University of Minnesota and is a graduate of Police Staff and Command from Northwestern University. During his 33 years in natural resource law enforcement he fine-tuned his investigation skills which now help him sort for accurate information. He also served a number of years on the Twin Cities Creation Science Association board of directors. Twin Cities Creation Science Association website: https://tccsa.tc/

While most people might be able to name one or two, few are aware of the sheer number of embarrassing deceptions used to prop up evolutionary theory. This talk highlights multiple examples that have misled generations. Some, like the famous Piltdown Man fraud, took many decades to uncover while leading evolutionists kept singing its praises to an increasingly indoctrinated public.

Today, Bible-believers are a great minority among practicing scientists and are subject to much persecution. Yet, modern science was developed on principles directly derived from Christian theology. Despite that history, science today operates without even token admission of its roots. How does this affect current scientific practices? Can we trust the conclusions of all those men and women in white lab coats? Can science operate in a moral and ontological vacuum? We will examine three examples of how the turn from belief in God has affected modern thought: geomorphology (the shape of the earth's surface), fossilization (the process of preserving the remains of living organisms), and genetics (specifically as it relates to the genetic history of mankind). In each of these subject areas, we will examine the evolutionary scenarios put forth to date and weigh them against solid biblical exposition. In the end, we will see that the evolutionary conclusions for each of these subjects is derived more from starting assumptions than it is from reality. Science belongs under the umbrella of Christianity.

"A New Look at the Fall of Man" will take the traditional event of the "Fall" found in Genesis 3 and show that there is another possible way to look at it. A way that elevates Adam and keeps him from being thrown under the bus. You may never read about the fall into sin the same way ever again.