Cicero on Oratory - B2 - XVII XVIII

Cicero on Oratory - B2 - XVII XVIII

In this chapter, Antonius discusses the challenges and intricacies of oratory, emphasizing that true eloquence goes beyond mere practice and requires deep knowledge and skill. He considers the difficulties of persuading audiences in contested causes, contrasting the ease of discussing general concepts with the complexities of practical oratory. The discussion also reflects on the importance of experience over theoretical knowledge in mastering oratory.

Key Points:

The Difficulty of Oratory
Antonius explains that while discussing general ideas may seem easier, contested causes demand the utmost skill and resilience from an orator. The orator must effectively counteract adversaries while molding audience emotions and responses through persuasive speech.

Role of Experience
The significance of real-world experience in oratory is emphasized. Antonius argues that those who only learn from books, without practical exposure, lack the necessary insights to teach others effectively about the art of speaking.

Conciliation Over Eloquence
Antonius argues that past orators, like Catulus, relied more on conciliating good will than on forceful eloquence. He expresses a desire to learn effective methods and precepts of oratory, suggesting that knowledge is sought not for personal gain, but rather to understand the art deeply.

Critique of Theoretical Teachers
A critique is presented regarding educators who deliver instructions on oratory without having experienced real challenges themselves. Antonius cites the example of Hannibal, underscoring the arrogance of teaching military strategy without practical military experience.