Globalisation of Socialism and Nationalism

Glen Diesen and Anatol Lieven comment on the shifting framework for international relations. The EU news media's desire for continued war on Russia appears to be related to:
-the failure of Socialist EU expansion placing many EU politician's ideology and election prospects under threat.
-the desire of the EU to foster unity by having a common enemy i.e. Russia and using fear to extract money (i.e. political power) from the EU public.
International Socialism (politicians supporting international socialism are often called "globalists") appears to be unintentionally creating political opposition globally, in the form of various countries who support national sovereignty, and self government.
Almost, but not quite an international union against EU style "global" socialism. EU socialism or 'globalism' could be characterised as a managed form of democracy, where its proponents view the public incapable of reliably selecting leaders. This form of managed democracy, (consequently, and obviously) intentionally endeavours to weaken democratic voting rights and diminish public accountability for elected leaders. However, in the view of the supporters of managed democracy, it has idealogically more stable, and skilled parliamentary 'human leadership'.
It became clear in about 2021 that international socialism was very influential when we began to observe cooperation between the socialist EU politicians and the US Democrats (both sometimes called 'liberals', or 'the left').
If one considers the opposition to international socialism, its opponents include Russia (which is conservative and nationalist). and also the US under Donald Trump's leadership.
Trump's US administrative team is now directly involving itself with politics in Europe (cf. J.D. Vance's address at the Munich security conference), criticising the suppression of EU right wing parties which advocate for national sovereignty, rather than centralised less accountable super-national governance.
Incidentally, the European Union's "ethical values", appear to have a religious foundation of humanism e.g. "human rights", and DEI. DEI and Transhumanism being examples of the theory that human individuals can determine their own identity. However, EU humanism has weak support by the EU public. Its even axiomatic that parents in any country do want their impressionable children (under the age of consent) to have their genitals reconstructed by surgery, without their consent. Neither do parents wish the government to administer psychoactive hormonal drugs to their children without their consent. Yet, this is what the EU has done, as has the Democrat party in the US.