E4: Virology: Science or Scientism?- An overview of Logical Fallacies

Is virology truly a science, or is it built on inference, assumption, and institutional authority rather than direct empirical proof? In this episode, we break down why virology fails under epistemological scrutiny. Unlike disciplines that follow a strict hierarchy of evidence, virology relies on flawed experiments, indirect reasoning, and widespread belief rather than demonstrable, repeatable science.
We dive into:
🔹 The lack of direct evidence for contagion
🔹 Why "virus isolation" doesn't meet true scientific standards
🔹 How epistemology reveals virology’s logical flaws
🔹 The role of authority and consensus in shaping public perception
Chad Shibuti’s conclusion? Virology does not meet the epistemic standards required for genuine knowledge. It’s time to challenge the assumptions and demand real scientific justification.
📢 Subscribe & Share if you’re ready to question the mainstream narrative and explore the truth behind modern medicine.
#VirologyExposed #MedicalScience #ContagionMyth #VirusIsolation #CriticalThinking