Report #3 - Canadian Law Study Group

This is the 3rd in a series of my reports that take a close look at our toothless chihuahuas here in Canada. This 3rd report is about Amanda Ridding's Canadian Law Study Group

1 Introduction 00:00:08
2 Video and text reports 00:02:51
2.1 Video section times 00:03:23
3 Why Amanda and her group? 00:04:05
4 Overview 00:06:50
5 Part 1 - Ignoring the fundamentals of this global war 00:11:10
5.1 Step 1 – The three critical criteria 00:12:13
5.2 Step 2 – NRRM 00:13:28
5.3 Step 3 – OSMR 00:13:45
6 Part 2 – What is Amanda’s contribution in this global war? 00:14:50
6.1 Objective? 00:14:57
6.2 R v Ridding 00:16:10
6.3 Substack 00:17:45
6.4 The woman in the red dress 00:20:26
6.4.1 Chinese or gibberish? 00:20:40
6.5 More complicating law! 00:26:31
6.6 A LEGO Action 00:34:12
6.7 Telegram 00:38:49
6.8 Is the BNA Act 1867 a legitimate constitution? 00:41:53
6.9 Eleven questions 00:46:28
6.10 Might is right! 00:47:38
6.11 Amanda is a one-trick pony 00:52:06
7 Conclusion 00:54:00