WATCH: Scott Jennings DESTROYS Julie Roginsky after fearmongering over deported MS‑13 gangbanger

Last night on CNN NewsNight with Abby Phillip, conservative commentator Scott Jennings ruthlessly rebuked Democratic strategist Julie Roginsky for her “fearmongering” over the deportation of alleged MS‑13 member Kilmar Armando Abrego García. Roginsky had warned that García “received no due process” and was sent to what she called a “foreign country” where his life was at risk—but Jennings sharply corrected her and dismantled her talking points, insisting the administration was simply enforcing U.S. immigration law

Key Exchange: “It’s Not a Foreign Country... By Who?”
During the heated back‑and‑forth, Roginsky argued that García couldn’t be returned to El Salvador because he would face harm. Jennings fired back:

JENNINGS: “It’s not a foreign country. He lives there.”
ROGINSKY: “This man received no due process, disappeared to a foreign country.”
JENNINGS: “By who? I’m asking you—by who was he at risk of being harmed?”
ROGINSKY: “That is what a federal judge said.”
JENNINGS: “No. Who’s he at risk from?”
ROGINSKY: “I don’t know.”
JENNINGS: “A rival gang.”

Jennings’s relentless questioning left Roginsky visibly flustered and underscored the basic fact: El Salvador is García’s home country, not some “foreign” place he’d never known.

Reality Check: Enforcement, Not Persecution
Jennings went on to note that García, once deported, would simply be re‑arrested if he tried to return—and that no executive overreach was at play, but rather a straightforward application of immigration statutes. He pointed out that the Supreme Court’s unanimous 9–0 decision affirmed the government’s authority to remove individuals without “special” humanitarian exceptions, a detail the left‑leaning panelists had glossed over

The Broader Pattern
This demolition follows a spate of similar Jennings victories on CNN, where he’s become known for calmly exposing faulty premises and forcing liberal guests to retreat from exaggerated claims. His performance last night not only punctured Roginsky’s narrative but also illustrated how factual precision can cut through partisan rhetoric—leaving critics scrambling for a coherent reply

Whether you agree with his stance or not, Scott Jennings’s takedown of Julie Roginsky is already being touted as one of his most brutal yet—and it’s a must‑watch for anyone following the debate over executive power and immigration enforcement.