Premium Only Content

Permission To Destroy The Administrative State
Listen to the BRILLIANCE of the great Justice Gorsuch.
License Fockery....let me lay it out for you.
He is SAYING as recently as 2024 not only in his opinion of this EPIC EPIC EPIC SCOTUS ruling, but also in his book tour, that the administrative state cannot violate the private rights of the people.
There is no more important education you can get than this in 2025.
Let me explain it in a way ALL WILL UNDERSTAND.
If I obtain a driver's license from the state AGENCY OF...the DMV...then THEY CONSIDER ME to be in a CONTRACT with them, and as such, are under their jurisdiction...
And I knowingly waived all my rights...
And I am considered an unpaid EMPLOYEE of the agency....
So therefore, I must be held accountable for breaking their rules and agree for them to "charge me" with their citations...
Then "bill the charges"....which enters me into their private for profit corporation of the traffic "court", justice "court" etc, they're just names made up.
Where they all get paid by the same higher up corporations.
I do not see a real judge.
I do not have a jury.
They mail me my only options of:
1. Pay and plead guilty!
2. Pay and plead no contest.
3. Plead not guilty and hire ONE OF THEIR TRAINED MONKEYS who will "maneuver" me through their system, where...I WILL END UP PAYING ANYWAY.
None of that is in front of an Article III JUDICIARY which is entirely separate from an Article I "judge" (costume) created by the legislature, who can only regulate commerce, which a living man or woman can't EVER BE IN.
I will die on this hill and destroy this until I draw my last breath on earth FOR ALL OF YOU STUCK IN THE HYPNOSIS of the government having authority over your right to travel.
For all the losers who Grok this, Grok gathers from ARTICLES WRITTEN BY BAR CARD agents of the state who don't ever want you to know you have freedom and rights.
It's right here from the Supreme Court.
Traffic court is an IN HOUSE COURT invented by the DMV AGENCIES.
Until and unless there is a victim harmed, there is no crime...ever.
From the Trump EO & Memorandum:
"SEC v. Jarkesy, 603 U.S. 109 (2024) held that it violates the Seventh Amendment for agencies to adjudicate common-law claims in their in-house courts.
Agencies accordingly must repeal any regulation authorizing enforcement proceedings that enable the agency’s courts to impose judgments or penalties that can only be obtained via jury trial in Article III Courts."
"Agency's courts".
"Impose judgements".
You are entitled to an Article III common law jury (as per the 7th Amendment)
They will never put this on the walls of the DMV or traffic courts.
It's up to you to exercise your rights.
Follow me to freedom!
Save the country!
-
8:38
Legal Fockery With Gianna & Scott
9 days agoHere's Your IRS Exit Plan
284 -
1:23:46
Sean Unpaved
3 hours agoOctober Blitz: Wild Card Game 3s, CFB Coaching Chaos, & TNF Fireworks
27.1K2 -
1:01:36
Dear America
2 hours agoEpisode 2 Graham Allen Show
37.6K42 -
1:59:01
The Charlie Kirk Show
3 hours agoCancel Netflix? + The Secret Service Disaster + Turning Point Everywhere | Tatum, Cocca, Gaffrey
90.8K43 -
LIVE
ahdedazs
2 hours ago $0.37 earnedBlack Ops 7 EARLY ACCESS BETA! First Stream on RUMBLE!
112 watching -
LIVE
ZENNY
2 hours agoBO7 IS HERE BOT POV MF HAHAHAHA 6v6 PG18+ | UNFILTERED CHAT | CURSES AND BAD
47 watching -
LIVE
qixso
3 hours ago $0.79 earnedBO7 IS HERE TAP IN !! | @qixso
90 watching -
1:37:49
Tucker Carlson
16 hours agoBlackmail, Bribes, and Fear: Netanyahu Claims He Controls Donald Trump and America. Tucker Responds.
85.9K271 -
1:37:29
The Mel K Show
4 hours agoMORNINGS WITH MEL K - Information Warfare & Common Sense 10-2-25
21.4K8 -
1:26:12
Steven Crowder
6 hours agoThe Left is Violent (Part 2) | Change My Mind
339K522