Poilievre Defends Refusal of Security Clearance : “I Refused the Gag Order”

📝 DESCRIPTION
Pierre Poilievre refuses security clearance, and his reason is sending shockwaves through the political world. During the 2025 election debate, Poilievre clashed with Liberal leader Mark Carney, defending his refusal by claiming that the clearance would come with a “gag order” that could legally silence him on matters like Chinese election interference. He argued that accepting it would prevent him from exposing foreign threats and holding the Trudeau government accountable. Carney, however, insisted that clearance is essential for informed leadership. In this video, we break down the fiery exchange, the accusations about Liberal candidates, China, and the implications for national security and free speech. Did Poilievre make a bold stand for transparency, or did he dodge a crucial responsibility? Watch and decide for yourself. Like, comment, and share if you believe truth shouldn't be silenced by politics.

⏰ TIMESTAMP
00:00:00 Security Clearance Clash
00:00:08 Carney's Concern
00:00:41 950-Day Question
00:01:11 Simple Procedure
00:02:45 "Gag Order" Claim
00:02:51 Free Speech Priority
00:03:08 China Interference Example
00:03:38 Liberal Candidate Link
00:06:09 Other Leaders Mentioned
00:06:33 Leadership Style Clash
00:09:31 Liberty vs. Order
00:09:53 Impact on Public Perception
00:10:35 Fundamental Values
00:10:43 Nature of Freedom

🔍 KEYWORD
#pierrepoilievre #securityclearance #foreigninterference #markcarney #canadaelection2025 #freedomofspeech #trudeaugagorder #nationalsecuritydebate #chineseinterference #poilievrevscarney