PBS: Trumpism Undermines U.S.-Led Liberal World Order’s Reliance On U.S. Constitutional Boundaries

I can’t believe PBS seriously claims the U.S.-led liberal world order relies on U.S. constitutional boundaries, a notion as baseless as it is absurd. The PBS show, hosted by Christiane Amanpour in London, features a Harvard professor and a professor of European studies at Oxford University to peddle calculated globalist hysteria over “Trumpism,” fixating on a so-called retreat from the liberal world order and falsely claiming it depends on constitutional boundaries. In truth, the liberal world order thrives without constitutional limits, prioritizing international agendas, progressive ideals, global influence, intergovernmental organizations, and international agreements before the U.S. Constitution. Notably, Christiane Amanpour, a British-Iranian journalist born in London, broadcasts from there, revealing her disconnect from the U.S. perspective and the Constitution she critiques.

Amanpour calls the U.S. an “American experiment,” but we are a country, not an experiment. Unsurprisingly, Amanpour paints Trump as the villain dismantling her cherished liberal world order. She said, "the bottom line apparently is that liberalism requires power to be contained within its authorized and constitutional boundaries, executive power...” when the liberal world order operates independently of such constraints. Such claims are utterly misguided, ignoring the liberal world order’s independence from U.S. constitutional constraints.

This is such nonsense. I could pick apart every word but I'll spare you that. But I'd love to hear your opinions on it. LOL