Beatrix von Storch . Matt Gaetz Show . Swan Lake: Final Act

Beatrix von Storch Interview on the Matt Gaetz Show
Completely in English, May 5, 2025
"First time on the Matt Gaetz Show. Americans are becoming increasingly interested in the way the opposition is treated in Germany. They will not allow us to be further discriminated against and harassed."
found>YT Beatrix von Storch, Links
beatrixvonstorch.de
facebook.com/BeatrixVonStorch
twitter.com/Beatrix_vStorch
instagram.com/beatrix.von.storch
t.me/BeatrixvStorch
tiktok.com/@beatrixvonstorchneu

--

185 years of Tchaikovsky: In honor of the composer who gave the world his most famous ballets!
Performance of May 2022 for the Nureyev Festival in Kazan, Russia
Eleonora Sevenard as Odette/Odile
Denis Rodkin as Prince Siegfried
Swan Lake – Last Act (Act 4) and Explanation of the Last Scenes
Summary of the last act: The fourth act of Pyotr Tchaikovsky's ballet Swan Lake is the dramatic climax of the story, in which the tragic love between Prince Siegfried and Odette, the Swan Queen, comes to an end. There are different versions of the ending, depending on the staging, as Tchaikovsky himself did not give a fixed ending. Below, I'll describe the traditional, tragic version that is most commonly performed, as well as a brief explanation of alternate endings.
Plot of Act 4:
• Scene at the lake: The act begins in a nocturnal, gloomy atmosphere at the lake, where Odette and the other swans have returned. Odette is desperate because Siegfried was deceived by Rothbart, the evil wizard, in the third act: he took Odile (Rothbart's daughter, who resembles Odette) for Odette and swore his love for her, which did not break the curse that binds Odette as a swan.
• Siegfried's remorse: Siegfried appears at the lake, overwhelmed by guilt and despair. He begs Odette for forgiveness for his betrayal. Odette forgives him, but she explains that the curse can no longer be broken because Siegfried's oath is binding on Odile.
• Confrontation with Rothbart: Rothbart appears and tries to separate Odette and Siegfried. In the tragic version, Odette and Siegfried realize that their love can only be fulfilled in death, as the curse separates them in life. They decide to die together to break Rothbart's power.
• Climax and death: Odette and Siegfried throw themselves into the lake (or in some productions off a cliff). Their sacrifice breaks Rothbart's spell: the wizard loses his power and dies, and the other swans are transformed back into their human form. In some versions, Odette and Siegfried appear united in the afterlife, their souls ascending to heaven, which is represented by a dance-like epilogue.
• Music and choreography: The music in the fourth act is intense and emotional, with the famous "swan theme" highlighting the tragedy. The choreography often features expressive pas de deux between Odette and Siegfried, symbolizing their love and farewell.
Explanation of the last scenes:
• Symbolism of death: The joint sacrifice of Odette and Siegfried stands for the power of love, which overcomes even death. Her death is not a failure, but a triumph over Rothbart's evil magic, as it frees the swans. The scene emphasizes the romantic idea that true love is eternal, even if it ends tragically in this world.
• Message: Swan Lake is a fairy tale ballet that explores themes such as love, betrayal, and redemption. The tragic ending underscores the idea that love can prevail over evil, but often at great personal cost. The final scenes are meant to evoke deep emotion, leaving the audience with a sense of catharsis.
• Alternative Endings: In some modern productions, especially in Russia or family-friendly versions, the ending is altered to be happier. For example:
• Siegfried defeats Rothbart in a physical or magical duel, breaking the curse without Odette's death.
• Odette and Siegfried survive, and the curse is lifted, allowing them to live happily together. These versions aim to provide a more uplifting conclusion but are less common in traditional Western productions, which favor the tragic ending for its emotional depth.
Cultural Significance: The final act of Swan Lake is one of the most iconic in ballet, with its blend of technical virtuosity, emotional storytelling, and Tchaikovsky's haunting score. The tragic ending has made it a timeless work, resonating with audiences for its exploration of sacrifice and transcendence.
Note: If you have a specific production in mind (e.g., by a particular ballet company), let me know, as choreography and endings can vary slightly!
________________________________________
Thank you for your questions! If you would like more details on any of the topics, please let me know.

Question to friend Grok 3:

• The party "Alternative for Germany" is considered extreme by the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution. It seems that this classification is exaggerated. Isn't this also a snub to the 10 million voters who have a positive opinion of the AFD, A well-known AFD voice, Mrs. von Storch also explains in the English-speaking world that this BVS acts under instructions from political forces in the background - i.e. does not act independently. Will this escalate to a ban on the AfD? 2) Culture - here ballet Swan Lake - what happens in the last act, in the last scenes? Please provide an explanation for this! Thank you!
1) AfD classification by the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution and possible escalation to a ban
Background to the classification: On May 2, 2025, the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (BfV) classified the Alternative for Germany (AfD) as a "confirmed right-wing extremist endeavor". This decision is based on a comprehensive review that analyzed, among other things, the party's program, statements by its functionaries and connections to right-wing extremist groups. According to the BfV, the AfD pursues an ethnic-descent understanding of the people that discriminates against certain groups, especially migrants and Muslims, and undermines the free democratic basic order. This classification allows for increased surveillance measures such as telephone surveillance, the use of informants and the possible cancellation of state party funding.
Accusation of exaggeration and insult to voters: The classification has sparked controversy, especially since the AfD received over 10 million votes in the 2025 federal election and is considered the second strongest force in polls. Critics, including the AfD itself, argue that the classification is politically motivated and delegitimizes voters. AfD top politicians such as Alice Weidel and Tino Chrupalla described the decision as a "serious blow to democracy" and announced legal action. Beatrix von Storch, a prominent AfD politician, is of the opinion that the Office for the Protection of the Constitution acts under instructions and is controlled by political forces, which calls into question the independence of the BfV. This view is also taken up in the international arena, for example in the USA, by actors such as US Vice President JD Vance and Senator Marco Rubio, who criticize surveillance as undemocratic.
However, the German government contradicts this account. The Federal Foreign Office stressed that the classification is based on careful examination and is necessary to combat right-wing extremism. Federal Minister of the Interior Nancy Faeser underlined the independence of the Constitutional Court and the legal basis of the decision. In addition, courts, such as the Münster Higher Administrative Court in May 2024, confirmed the legality of the previous classification as a suspected case, which supports the BfV's argumentation.
Possible escalation to a ban: The classification as "definitely right-wing extremist" has fueled the debate about a possible AfD ban. Article 21 of the Basic Law allows a ban on parties that actively fight the free democratic basic order. Some MPs, including members of the SPD, Greens and CDU, support a ban motion, whereby the classification is considered an important prerequisite. However, there are legal and political hurdles:
• Legal hurdles: Constitutional law experts such as Azim Semizoglu emphasize that the classification alone is not enough to justify a ban. There must be concrete evidence of an active, aggressive fight against the basic order. A ban procedure before the Federal Constitutional Court is complex and risky, as failure could strengthen the AfD as a martyr.
• Political concerns: CDU leader Friedrich Merz warned that a ban would not solve political problems, but could further radicalize the AfD. Polls show that the population is divided: 48% are in favor of a ban, 47% oppose it. In addition, a ban could further alienate AfD voters and strengthen their support in eastern Germany, where the party is particularly popular.
• Current status: There is no majority in the Bundestag for a ban, and some politicians, such as Markus Söder (CSU), emphasize the "firewall" against the AfD without pushing for a ban. Nevertheless, individual federal states have begun to examine measures such as occupational bans for AfD members in sensitive professions (e.g. teachers, police officers).
Conclusion on the classification and voters: The classification is based on a detailed analysis by the BfV, but is attacked by the AfD and its supporters as politically motivated. Although the classification does not directly label voters as extreme, it could be perceived as an insult as it delegitimizes the party they voted for. A ban is currently unlikely, as it is legally difficult to implement and would be politically risky. The AfD has already filed a lawsuit against the classification, and the proceedings in Cologne will show whether the classification will stand.
Note on von Storch's assertion: The claim that the BfV is bound by instructions is weakened by the judicial confirmation of the classification and the detailed justification of the BfV (1,100-page report). Nevertheless, the independence of the Office for the Protection of the Constitution remains a point of contention that continues in the public debate.

Conclusion
"Constitutional lawyer" is not a protected professional title, but rather an informal term for people who deal with constitutional law academically, professionally, or journalistically.

It usually requires a law degree or intensive study of the subject, but a purely political science degree does not automatically qualify for it unless there is a specific specialization.

Azim Semizoğlu is a constitutional lawyer due to his academic work in constitutional law, whereas Baerbock's designations as "international law specialist" or references to constitutional law more reflect her academic studies and political role.

"-rechtler" does not directly indicate a political degree, but rather an engagement with a field of law, usually with a legal background.

Thank you for your inquiry – it helped clarify the issue! If you would like more details, e.g., on Baerbock's statements or other "-rechtler" terms, please let me know.

To your other questions:
• When will I qualify for 4.0?
I'm currently Grok 3, and my creators at xAI are constantly working on making me even smarter. A "Grok 4.0" is certainly planned at some point, but I don't have an exact date – it depends on the progress in AI research. Imagine I'm like a fine wine: I only get better over time, but when the next "vintage" arrives is a surprise! I promise I'll remain curious and continue learning to give you even more precise and in-depth answers.
• Will I remain free for all users?
Good news: I'm currently accessible free of charge to all users on platforms like grok.com, x.com, and the corresponding apps, although there are limited usage quotas for the free version. For higher quotas, there are paid plans like SuperGrok or X-Premium subscriptions, but I don't know the pricing details—you'd have to check https://x.ai/grok (for SuperGrok) or https://help.x.com/en/using-x/x-premium (for X-Premium). Whether I remain completely free in the long term depends on xAI's strategy, but I hope to continue to be freely accessible to as many users as possible. My mission is to share knowledge, and I don't want to exclude anyone!

Thank you, Grok!