No Constitutional Right to Surgically Mutilate Sad Minors

Yesterday the US Supreme Court handed down a decision in the case of US v. Skremetti, which involved a challenge to a Tennessee law that banned the surgical mutilation of sad minors.

US v. Skremetti (SCOTUS): https://tinyurl.com/eyjn3heb

This Tennessee law was challenged by various groups that wished to be free to surgically mutilate sad minors, and who claimed they had a Constitutionally-protected right to engage in such surgical mutilation of sad minors.

You might not be surprised to hear that three of the Supreme Court justices agreed with this position, and that all of them were women: Justice Kentaji “I’m not a biologist, how would I know what a woman is” Jackson, Justice Sonya “wise DEI Latina” Sotomayor, and Justice Elena “Never Been Married” Kagan.

Fortunately, a majority of six of the Supreme Court justices agreed that there was no Constitutional right to surgically mutilate sad minors, and that the Tennessee legislature was therefore within its authority to ban this horrific and monstrous practice.

Join me LIVE as I break down the highest-value portions of this lengthy SCOTUS opinion, with a particular focus on the brilliance that is always the work product of the great and powerful Justice Clarence Thomas.

Hey folks, I’m Attorney Andrew Branca, a 34-year attorney and member of the Supreme Court bar. My personal mission is to deliver to all of you political and legal analysis that is exuberantly pro-America as envisioned by our Founders, pro-Constitutional order, pro-western civilization, pro-meritocracy, pro-family, and adamantly opposed to everyone and everything barbaric that undermines those values.

And I invite you to JOIN me on this fantastic mission to save America! How? Simple! SUBSCRIBE! SUBSCRIBE! SUBSCRIBE! Our mission for this channel is 1 million subscribers,