Summertime.........and

The world's getting crazy...
https://slaynews.com/news/eu-leader-backs-trump-china-tariffs-donald-right/U.S. District Judge Andrew Krause rejected Project Veritas’s motion to seal deposition materials and bar James O’Keefe from attending testimony, despite claims of harassment, threats, and “witness intimidation.”The hearing, part of Project Veritas v. O’Keefe, revealed explosive new details. Veritas attorney Michael Harris argued that depositions used in OMG’s docu-series, The Truth Inside Veritas, led to threats including “death threats." Harris claimed the coverage intimidated witnesses and asked the court to move depositions to a remote format.Judge Krause disagreed. “This is a public proceeding,” he stated. “Requests to seal materials retroactively are generally looked at disfavorably.”O’Keefe’s lawyer, Nick Whitney, responded, not only defending O’Keefe’s right to be present, but revealing that two witnesses testified under oath that Veritas board member Matthew Tyrmand said he wanted to “decapitate James O’Keefe and eat his heart with a spoon.” Krause called the alleged statement “atrocious” and “disturbing.”Also introduced: an email from former Veritas attorney Paul Cali allegedly telling O’Keefe, “I’d love to punch you in your f---ing face.” Judge Krause declined to read the full email into the record, but acknowledged it was “hostile and aggressive.”The hearing also addressed a police report filed by witness George Skakel after O’Keefe appeared at his home for comment. The report noted no threats, just that Skakel wanted the interaction documented.From inside the courtroom, O’Keefe responded:“If they are embarrassed and humiliated by what they’re doing and saying going out into the public, maybe they should not engage in that behavior. The solution is not to seal up a public proceeding.”Judge Krause ultimately denied all Veritas motions, including the effort to restrict O’Keefe’s access to depositions.“It can’t just be the witness doesn’t feel like seeing Mr. O’Keefe,” he said.The court is expected to reconvene in the coming weeks. Stay tuned.https://politicalanimalnews.com/senator-john-kennedy-leveled-maxine-waters-and-gavin-newsom-with-one-brutal-shot-on-goal-that-has-everyone-talking/
https://www.mercurynews.com/2025/06/18/u-s-congressmen-state-lawmakers-decry-ice-deportation-of-beloved-livermore-father/
https://www.mercurynews.com/2025/06/18/summer-covid-levels-rise-razor-throat-symptom/
https://resistthemainstream.com/trumps-tucker-insult-triggers-mtg-as-maga-civil-war-erupts/
https://politicalanimalnews.com/soros-heirs-bride-to-be-made-one-surprising-confession-that-stunned-leftist-elites/
https://wro.nucleusemail.com/amplify/v/RwrJqrCq3g--
FAIR USE STATEMENT: According to the “Fair Use” clause of International Copyright Law, the author declares that the use of photos, images, lyrics, video, or any other information in all academic/reference/scholarly works we do is for the purpose of “criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, or research” according to Section 107. – Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair Use, U.S. Copyright Code. We believe that our not-for-profit research and educational use constitutes a fair use of any copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law.) United States Code: Title 17, Section 107FAIR USE NOTICE: Video may contain some copyrighted material whose use has not been authorized by the copyright owners. We believe that our not-for-profit educational use constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of the USCopyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this is distributed without profit with the included information for research and educational purposes.