The Rant-Child Mutilation?

The American Medical Association (AMA) has sided with child mutilation after a Supreme Court ruling, sparking outrage among medical professionals and human rights activists. The decision, which allowed a medical provider to perform a clitoridectomy on a minor girl in the US, is widely considered a violation of human rights and a form of gender-based violence. Critics argue that the ruling sets a dangerous precedent and is inconsistent with the AMA's commitment to patient safety and well-being. The AMA has defended its position, stating that parents should make informed decisions about their children's healthcare. However, many medical professionals and human rights activists disagree, arguing that child mutilation is a violation of human rights and carries significant risks, including severe pain, infection, bleeding, and even death. Many are now calling for the AMA to reconsider its position and prioritize patient safety and well-being over parental autonomy.