New Study Shocker: Does Almost Everyone Have the Origin of Humanity Wrong? It Makes No Sense!

A recently published (2025) Study in "Nature Genetics" by Ding, Hu et al throws the mainstream scientific narrative on its head. Humanity, that is our species alone and not Neanderthals or Denisovans, have about 21% of their genes from a mystery source. And these genes are concentrated in the brain and central nervous system. This is completely contrary to the mainstream narrative that these other species were "so much like us" and that they were just "different types of humans". Rather, Humanity seems to be a distinct population.

Link to Amazon Page of "Early Genesis, the Revealed Cosmology": https://www.amazon.com/dp/B06XRLDYJB

This study is called "A structured coalescent model reveals deep ancestral structure shared by all modern humans" https://www.nature.com/articles/s4158... https://www.youtube.com/redirect?event=video_description&redir_token=QUFFLUhqa0JxVUJVTVRKWkQ4LVFsdjd2eUhsdFRVcEhkUXxBQ3Jtc0ttcnh0emVfRnJuUnJ4REpubzdXM2pNM3loZDNvUjZWYU5fTklKeFNsRmctckllcm0tSUVqNERrcGE4WFVhVXNiTzBpd05MOE1RRFBrVENkdUpNanZiYkhEd3dHZ0dGWkszMFdUbmc2b2VXQ3pCZGcwMA&q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nature.com%2Farticles%2Fs41588-025-02117-1&v=yPu8_AO6nqI

Some other links which together show that the mainstream science media narrative about how humanity isn't that special are very wrong.

Home page of Cambridge Professor Dr. William Amos. There is a document for download(the question of neanderthal interbreeding) there which makes a devastating case, in advanced layman's terms, that the claim living Eurasians have 1.5% of their genes from Neandertal introgression is mistaken and the result of a basic and embarrassing error on the part of the most celebrated names in the field. https://www.zoo.cam.ac.uk/directory/w...
https://www.youtube.com/redirect?event=video_description&redir_token=QUFFLUhqbUJDSUU2UzFmRTVFcDEzemhUYTYtZmVVeGZYZ3xBQ3Jtc0tuUXR0SVhiRFhRUXNGalV4cXowUkFHSHZsNXZrakFLMnNSYXZhcjZiUEFhVGxXWTZZX1ItbUluY1JOajZwdjFUcG1ndndlWFJ2S1hJbjA5bTFjYzlSc2xWRU40UWh6Wm44Rm4tY2FZak8yN0ZJSXBCMA&q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.zoo.cam.ac.uk%2Fdirectory%2Fwilliam-amos&v=yPu8_AO6nqI

Here is the article in Nature which warns DSTATS can produce "spurious admixture events" if they don't also check for population structure as an explanation for the data. It is exactly what Dr. Amos is saying happened. https://www.nature.com/articles/s4155...
https://www.youtube.com/redirect?event=video_description&redir_token=QUFFLUhqbjFEUGMtbzFQZ3dsblplby1OZ3BQeWVpTkszd3xBQ3Jtc0trSFZBTnRacEQxNlVCdk9jRFozdWl1THZsNDNGQl94OGlhRkhBZTZDRHFjRHBCenE2M24zZzIwbjl6WUx0bVlMN2dOUXYwclJiUVRzVWZzRThXdFJWYVlaT3RsNno2c3JPZF9ISkhGMjBOYnBac1N3SQ&q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nature.com%2Farticles%2Fs41559-024-02591-6%3Ffbclid%3DIwY2xjawHzFwpleHRuA2FlbQIxMAABHe2sznUF5my4i9KDeBDZl5tW-CCIFVgQe5fZFSngOsvXK8AEBOsGtRTElA_aem_0DfafursBz7ln0yPEV_Trg&v=yPu8_AO6nqI

Just to give a hint of how messed up "most recent common ancestor" calculations are, here is a link to a paper that says Y-chromosomes have variable mutation rates, and the "older" ones like "B" mutate 1.5 times faster than the "younger" ones they used to figure coalesce times. This implies that instead of haplogroup "B" arising from 101 to 80 KYA it would be more like 67- 53 KYA. https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article/...
https://www.youtube.com/redirect?event=video_description&redir_token=QUFFLUhqbUVwTkdIVEplaFpOV1AtaXpDZFJNSEJJZ1N4Z3xBQ3Jtc0ttei1WTWZqdkpyeml5OVhFWjRONjNxLTZrUWlUbno2YVdrRmNTMDVQbEV3XzlfbG8ydmtBZUpnSHM4cjBkOC1ZMjFQbWtBVUU4ODZuMmNUdXNLTGlnT0dBTG9EMmZleDhQaHBPYmNrU2hGNWwzSWdNRQ&q=https%3A%2F%2Facademic.oup.com%2Fmbe%2Farticle%2F38%2F3%2F1000%2F5922624%3Flogin%3Dfalse&v=yPu8_AO6nqI