Birthing Person? The Question That Shook Congress

📝 DESCRIPTION
Birthing Person? The Question That Shook Congress

When Rep. Brandon Gill stood up in a June 24 hearing and asked the simple yet devastating question, “What is a birthing person?”, he pierced through political doublespeak—and forced a debate every taxpayer deserves. In this video, we break down why that moment matters for every citizen concerned with truth, transparency, and accountability.

In just one question, Gill exposed how government-funded programs can hide behind vague, ideological language—no clearer than in this $1.5 million NIH grant. When Ms. DiVito, the grant’s defender, couldn’t define her own terminology, it revealed a dangerous abdication of clarity in public policy. This issue goes deeper than semantics—it touches on how we expect our institutions to speak, to act, and to spend.

⚖️ We all value precision in law, science, medicine—and taxpayers demand that same clarity in policy language. It’s not exclusion to ask for definitions—it’s fairness. Words shape reality. When “birthing person” replaces “woman” in federal grants, we must ask: what are we really funding?

This isn’t partisan—it’s principled. If we lose clarity, we lose trust. We lose oversight. We lose democracy.

Is it acceptable for government to spend millions under vague terminology?

How do we demand better transparency from our political leaders?

Join the conversation. Watch, share, and—most importantly—reflect. Because freedom thrives when language is clear, truth is honored, and citizens hold power to account.

🔍 KEYWORD
#birthingperson #taxpayertransparency #clarityinlanguage #accountablegovernment #speechmatters