WTC Bldg. 7 - how did the BBC know about the collapse BEFORE it collapsed? PART 4 of 4

PART 4 of 4
ALL NAMES, PLACES, INFORMATION & POSSIBLE SCENARIOS are pure speculation based on information disseminated by us and our guest. Any information is pure speculation based on readily available information that has been declassified. Any scenarios are pure educated guesses based on information gathered nor was anything set out to incriminate anyone, or accuse any entity or organization of right or wrong doing. We merely speculate on uncomfortable scenarios that could be possible alternative explanations for what happened on 9/11. Some things are quite fishy, and we do not claim we know what actually happened and/or by whom, but we sure enjoyed throwing some 'crazy' ideas out there to make you, the viewer, think beyond the narratives you've heard or were led to believe, or thought you knew, or confirm what you already believe. Use an open mind to consider other scenarios in this odd and illogical event. You never know. You may look at the world in a whole different way.

Originally recorded November 18, 2024
We talk with T, a communications specialist and counter intelligence operative. His standard knowledge lends us some credibility to the scenarios we discuss. He has many insider contacts he has worked with in the past and discusses what he can talk about in these 4 episodes.

The BBC reported the collapse of Building 7 twenty minutes BEFORE it happens. More evidence a building would not just collapse from fires or even the debris form the tower would need to be incredible, as evidence shows from the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City in 1995. So could it collapse from the debris? Sure, of course. It's very possible, but seems odd and with the amount of damage the Murrah building sustained without collapsing, something seems different and not quite right with Building 7. Yes, we understand the buildings are built differently, but questions remain.

BBC
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4j3jhGKQzw0

more thermite reactions
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vy1oPmuZZ98

How demolitions look:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y0ap3TPoz_E

Into its footprint
https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-us-canada-14347435

building Implosions
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EbuxlI8ZCMo

Tropicana (also) showing the angled cuts into the columns
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4iqpn4Ld2XQ

Some show what happens without explosive assistance
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QCVDJG00Yng

Maybe this explains it?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bXs3KAf5Vaw
Maybe this debunks that above
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RihT2w98Kpw
and more lean...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FQmagEtuUe0

This video shows the resistance we talked about:
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/nw1-zwXQ-mM

So it is entirely possible that buildings don't necessarily fall into their footprint when collapsing, even with assistance from demolition explosives and prep work.

Although we reported that no buildings have collapsed due to fire, we did find a video about a High Rise apartment in Sao Paulo Brazil that DID collapse due to an insane fire, definitely much greater and more intense than Building 7 - but did collapse none-the-less, but yes, circumstances were different.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XwoBRHDLxdo
This collapse looks much more organic:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jf27GGZYT2s

Bottom line - there are still many questions and circumstances that just don't add up.

MERCH STORE:
TheRudeBarn.Etsy.com

#rudebarn
#therudebarn
#rudebarnpodcast
#therudebarnpodcast
#WTC7
#wtctowers
#9/11
#9/11attacks