National Security

1 month ago
2

For years, U.S. intelligence agencies have invoked national security threats to conceal their activities and withhold information—even from Congress, which is tasked with overseeing them. The courts have reinforced this secrecy by establishing a legal precedent known as the ‘state secrets privilege’, an evidentiary rule that allows the exclusion of evidence in legal cases based solely on affidavits from these agencies, claiming that disclosure could endanger national security. Given this context, is it possible that documents and videos related to Jeffrey Epstein’s activities have not been released because he was connected to intelligence agencies, and they claim exposure could pose a threat to national security? Join the conversation and get answers to this question and more on According2Sam episode #329.

If you received any value from this show, please consider supporting the show. There are a few ways you can contribute to According2Sam Podcast and help us bring you more valuable content. The easiest way is to like this video, leave a comment, subscribing to my channel and share the podcast. Another way is to donations of any amount to help with the production costs. You can find information on how to donate and the store on our website.

WEBSITE: https://www.according2sam.com/

Follow me:

YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/@according2sam/featured

RUMBLE: https://rumble.com/c/c-5326696

X: https://twitter.com/According2_Sam

FACEBOOK: https://www.facebook.com/groups/According2Sam/

INSTAGRAM: https://www.instagram.com/according2sam/

TICTOK: https://www.tiktok.com/@according2sampodcast

SUBSTACK: https://substack.com/@samuelwinchester

APPLE PODCAST: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...

SPOTIFY: https://open.spotify.com/show/0LGqz4v...

SOUNDCLOUD: https://soundcloud.com/sam-winchester-90639988

Loading comments...