Canadian Justice 3/3: Is the LSO a "racist and failed institution"?

In Hamza v Law Society of Ontario, the Law Society accused Hamza of being a ‘pseudo-intellectual white supremacist’ based on complaints by anonymous trolls on the internet who are complete strangers to him. All of them turned out to be agents of the Law Society who are connected to each other and Zionists based in Toronto, like the Law Society. Hamza is the first lawyer and academic in the history of the colony to be prosecuted for allegedly making ‘pseudo-intellectual white supremacist’ statements on social media—which disclaimed his account—by actual pseudo-intellectuals and white supremacists with no real or virtual connection to him. While prosecuting Hamza, the Law Society ordered a “high end” three-month suspension and nominal costs to Everett Ross Field: a Nazi who made thousands of racist and sexist videos and lied about it. The case, in short, was an inside job by the Law Society. What is more: it involves all the major political figures in the legal profession from start to finish. Atrisha Lewis, the leader of the Good Governance Coalition, for example, represented the main accuser, Ish Aderonmu, pro bono. Ish is a Muslim apostate who was recommended to law school by Zionist judges Lorne Sossin and Harry LaForme despite having no education and a criminal record. Hamza was finally judged by Ryan Alford, the leader of the anti-human rights StopSOP slate, together with Jean-Jacques Desgranges: both notorious racists and bigots, as many tweets of theirs attest. This video explores the scandalous connections between Hamza’s accusers and judges in more detail, showing how it was a targeted campaign to destroy his businesses and reputation. Hamza was the only Arabic-speaking trial lawyer in Southwestern Ontario. Attacking him was thus a way to attack the Arab community and their ability to access the legal system, costing his clients hundreds of thousands of dollars in offers alone—a form of collective punishment. Also, a way to get him to pay them to insult him. Ish’s friend Alyshah Hasham, a court reporter for the Toronto Star, specifically attacked Wizard of Laws: a forensics and analytics company accused of selling information about the racist profiles and criminal activities of Law Society officials. After blindly accusing Hamza of being a pseudo-intellectual white supremacist by using their insults as evidence and conclusions, the Law Society changed stories and accused him of being rude to lawyers who falsely accused his racialized Muslim orphan client of raping his sister, whose half a million-dollar estate they withheld and used to pay themselves for proceedings they threatened against them. The orphans complained about these lawyers. Instead of punishing them, however, the Law Society called them to bear false witness against Hamza, whom they’d never met. Its worst accusation is that he called one of them a “bad person” in an unconfirmed email for falsely accusing him and his clients. The Law Society’s materials are inauthentic by its own admission. Moreover, it accused Hamza of filing “closed” documents, thereby proving its materials and claims are forged. Their content is also manifestly false. As such, they cannot rely on them (as they did) without proving they are liars who would believe anything false about Hamza and nothing true. Indeed, the truth in this case is not obscure. Three facts are exceedingly clear. First, none of Hamza’s accusers are connected to him, nor would any of them initially identify themselves or testify and be cross-examined—which none of them did or were, with the judges’ illegal approval. Second, all are based in Toronto and connected to each other. Third, all are agents of the Law Society (the accuser and judge) who sought to suppress their identities and testimonies. Conversely, all of Hamza’s connections are witnesses against them, that they are liars. What is more: Ish’s family—including his father, an Imam—and hundreds of his former supporters testified that he’s a racist grifter, a hypocrite, a liar and a Muslim apostate. After dropping out of Toronto Metropolitan University, he sued it for $3.75M, accusing his racialized classmates and its (mostly black) administrators of being anti-black racists and Zionists, thereby confirming the identity of his sponsors, who withdrew their support, leaving him homeless. If what Hamza’s accusers said is true, there should be 3,000 witnesses against him (2021 ONSC 580 para 5(d)(vi)); not three slinking trolls for the Law Society. This case not only proves that the Law Society is a “racist and failed institution” but also that it is a criminal organization devoid of any scientific or moral value. For example, it took the Law Society four years and hundreds of thousands of dollars to figure out that Hamza is not a white supremacist, let alone a white European, but a survivor of many attempted genocides by Zionists and white supremacists like his accusers and judges. He is also not uneducated like his accusers and judges, who are less educated than the average young Canadian and would not prosecute themselves when accused of the same and worse by their own sworn witnesses, namely Ish and LA, who turned against them.

0:00 Outline
0:25 Failure to cooperate
7:07 Racist, uncivil, ungovernable
39:02 Case summary
43:35 The Law Society’s history of racism and crime
50:31 A “racist and failed institution”?
1:01:32 “Credits”

CORRECTIONS: The Zuker citation that doesn't appear at 44:42 is Zuker (Re), 1999 CanLII 18536 (ON LST).