Illegal-Hiding Judge “Diner” Dugan’s Legal Defense is a JOKE!

This past April Wisconsin Judge Hannah “Diner” Dugan obstructed the lawful arrest of illegal migrant third-world invader Eduardo Flores-Ruiz by ICE agents executing a lawful order of deportation. Agents would ultimately have to chase Flores-Ruiz down a public street after his surreptitious release by Judge “Diner” Dugan, and secure his arrest.

Unfortunately for Judge “Diner” Dugan, her escapades were entirely captured on court house surveillance cameras. As one might guess, this conduct is a violation of Federal law, and Judge Dugan was indicted for violating two federal statutes collectively good for 13 years in prison. She has been suspended from the bench pending her criminal prosecution proceedings in federal court.

Hard facts make for a hard legal defense, and Judge “Diner” Dugan now finds herself having to raise the most outrageously ridiculous legal defenses in an effort to have the federal charges against her dismissed. A federal magistrate has already produced a 37-page legal analysis breaking down precisely why “Diner” Dugan is not entitled to dismissal and ought to proceed to trial—but that’s not the final decision on this question.

The unelected, black-robed, tyrannical, inferior, federal district trial judge assigned to the “Diner” Dugan case is Lynn Adelman, a rather infamous left-wing judge appointed to the federal bench by Bill Clinton in 1997. Prior to that, Adelman was an infamously left-wing Wisconsin legislator. Given the recent conduct of the federal bench in the law fare it is waging against Trump in general and the nation’s immigration law in particular, one would expect Adelman to take an extra-judicially lenient view of “Diner” Dugan’s demands for dismissal.

In today’s show we take a look at this week’s most recent motion by Department of Justice prosecutors exposing why “Diner” Dugan’s legal arguments for dismissal are without merit, and why she should face trial for her violation of federal felony crimes.

Join me LIVE at 11 AM ET as I break it all down!

I’m Andrew Branca, a 34-year attorney and member of the Supreme Court bar. My personal mission is to deliver to all of you political and legal analysis that is exuberantly pro-America as envisioned by our Founders, pro-Constitutional order, pro-western civilization, pro-meritocracy, pro-family, and adamantly opposed to everyone and everything barbaric that undermines those values.

My goal is to do what I can to save America, currently in a desperate and existential war against enemies foreign and domestic, from a destruction that would cast ourselves, our posterity, and indeed the world into a dark ages for centuries to come.

And I invite each of YOU to join me in this desperate but worthy mission to save our great nation.