Humans Didn't Build The Pyramids

DracoReptoidsExposed

Jordan Maxwell, Alexander Retrov, David Icke, and Lloyd Pye challenge the conventional understanding of ancient history and technology. The core of their argument is that ancient civilizations, specifically the builders of the Great Pyramid of Giza and other megalithic structures, possessed an advanced level of technology that has been deliberately concealed or ignored by modern historians and archaeologists. They contend that the sheer scale, precision, and weight of these structures cannot be explained by the simple tools and methods typically attributed to these cultures, leading them to believe in a lost, planet-wide civilization with a high degree of technical sophistication.

A central piece of evidence for their case is the Great Pyramid of Giza itself. They describe the monument’s massive stones, some allegedly weighing as much as 1,400 tons, and dismiss the idea that such enormous blocks could have been moved and positioned using simple tools. They further support this by using a mathematical argument, calculating that if the 2.3 million blocks were placed by the entire population of Egypt for three months a year, a new block would have had to be set every two seconds—a feat they label as "crazy." This line of reasoning is intended to show the inherent impossibility of the conventional explanation.

They extend their argument beyond the Great Pyramid by pointing to other megalithic structures around the world. They highlight the incredible precision of ancient stonework, describing the surfaces of stones in Egyptian temples as "flawlessly true squared" with a mirror-like finish, a result they believe could not have been achieved with a simple chisel. They also bring up other monumental structures, such as a 440-ton stone in Peru and the 800-ton Trilithon stones at Baalbek in Lebanon, all of which, they claim, defy explanation by conventional archaeological methods, suggesting a shared, advanced technological heritage. A powerful and specific example of this lost technology, according to the speakers, is the unfinished, 1,170-ton obelisk at the Aswan quarry. They describe marks on the stone that suggest it was cut with a machine, possibly a "belt sander," rather than by hand tools. The fact that this massive obelisk was abandoned is presented as a clue, and the speakers assert that even with modern technology, it would be impossible to move or cut such a stone out of the ground today. This point is intended to further underscore the idea that the ancients had a technological capability that has since been lost...

https://youtu.be/qOJguCn6G8I?si=_b2mQqJer1w3_iro